Answer:
Women in the 1830s wore full or ankle length one-piece dresses of wool, silk or cotton.
Explanation:
Women in the 1830s wore full or ankle length one-piece dresses of wool, silk or cotton.
Simple day dresses for house and farm work opened down the front to the waist, (the better to serve the needs of the nursing infant.) They were pinned closed, or fastened with hooks and eyes closely set.
The sleeves were usually long; the fashion of the 1830s had most of the fullness very high early in the decade, lower in the arm as the '30s progressed. Skirts were very full, either pleated or gathered onto the bodice. The waist was slightly higher than natural waistline. Necklines were generally modest, although lower cut was considered appropriate for festive evening or party wear. A fichu, modesty ruffle, or lace was usually worn on lower-cut necklines.
Day dresses had several removable collars and capelets which were worn in layers over the shoulders. These "pelerines" often matched the fabric of the dresses, or were of sheer white linen or cotton. Sometimes they were elaborately embroidered. Day dresses were apt to be made of serviceable dark color – especially winter garments.
Answer:
The only time I believe it should be permissible for the rights of an individual to infringe on the rights of a group is when that group is doing any kind of wrongdoing such as harming another person, or a person's happiness or property. You shouldn't have any right to affect another's group rights or decision unless it causes harm or indirect harm.
Explanation:
Well even though im not writing the two paragraphs for you, Im going yo give you info about one of the cases so that you can do the paragraphs. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Gibbons v. Ogden is considered a landmark supreme court case on the issue of the Interstate Commerce Clause. Aaron Ogden was given an exclusive license to operate a shipping business within the State of New York. He sued a man named Thomas Gibbons, who ran a competing shipping business between New Jersey and New York City, claiming that Gibbon's operations in the State of New York were illegal.<span>The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Thomas Gibbons. Hope this works good for you. </span>
Answer:
A random selection of 500 citizens to make up a jury
Explanation:
Answer:
B.) The British won the fight over the fertile Ohio River Valley and gained control of most French lands in North America.
Explanation:
it's right on edge
