Question

In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of challenging the credibility of a source?

Answer 1

I would go with B, I do not for sure know the answer but that is the one that seems to make the most sense

Answer 2

Question: In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of challenging the credibility of a source?

Options:

• A. Readers of John Milton's paradise lost often search for a hero in the form of a character, which is fruitless.  
• B. Iku Saito argues that homer was the greatest writer of Epics, but it’s a common flaw to call the first the greatest.
• C. Alex Fernandez's interpretation of J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye is interesting but ultimately flawed.  
• D. Henry Taylor's argument seems to be developing but his essay is an unfinished thesis, not a published article.

Answer: The correct answer is option B) Iku Saito argues that homer was the greatest writer of Epics, but it's a common flaw to call the first the greatest.

Explanation: The credibility of a source can be questioned or challenged based on the lack of evidence given. In the example given above, the person is questioning or challenging the credibility of Homer actually being the greatest writer if epics. He mentions that even though he was the first writer in epics, that doesn't make him the best.