The Lowell Mill Girls were youthful female specialists who came to work in modern companies in Lowell, Massachusetts, amid the Industrial Revolution in the United States. The laborers at first enlisted by the companies were little girls of propertied New England ranchers, normally between the ages of 15 and 35.[1] By 1840, at the tallness of the Industrial Revolution, the material plants had selected more than 8,000 ladies, who came to make up almost seventy five percent of the factory workforce.
Amid the early period, ladies went to the factories voluntarily, for different reasons: to enable a sibling to pay for school, for the instructive open doors offered in Lowell, or to procure advantageous pay. While their wages were just 50% of what men were paid, many could accomplish monetary autonomy out of the blue, free from controlling dads and spouses. Thus, while manufacturing plant life would before long come to be experienced as severe, it empowered these ladies to challenge sexual orientation generalizations. hope this helps
Compared with Medieval art, the purpose of Renaissance art was to show the wealth of patrons.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
Art of the period of the renaissance were the paintings, sculptures and other such things which were of the European history. Renaissance are had the purpose to show the money and richness of patrons who would give money to an artist for their work.
As an example, there was a famous family of Florence who supported the art of that period by giving money to the artists therefore showing that they had a lot of money and were wealthy. There were also other such people and families who supported art of that people.
Plato contends we are all made of the same three parts yet not all have the parts aligned in a healthy balance. The result is that greed, ambition, and foolishness rule in these unbalanced people. Plato lived through the democratic period in Athens' government and through the oligarchy period when the conquering Spartans installed the wealthy oligarchists as rulers of Athens, a move that unleashed a fierce retribution of bloodshed upon the unseated democratic rulers.
Plato rejected the rule of the mistake prone and seemingly unreasoning democratic faction and equally rejected the oligarchic rule of the retaliatory wealthy elite. After a period of seclusion, Plato wrote the Republic. In it he describes human nature and uses human nature (as he described it) as a metaphor and template for a reasonable government.
He assigns ruling authority to those who have a functioning alignment and balance between their three constituent parts and a dominant dedication to the highest: (1: lowest) love of money (laboring and merchants classes), (2: middle-most class) love of honor (military), and (3: highest) love of wisdom ("scientists, scholars, high-level experts, and similar sophisticates" [Jorn K. Bramann]).
His idea is that the two models he has seen don't work, so a third is needed. That third model is to make a government out of those who have the best minds by virtue of being best trained, best informed and best balanced (in the quote below, take note of and understand the "or"):
Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy, ... cities will never have rest from their evils. (Republic)
Nehru prioritized democracy and industries as his pillars of economic development. many independent countries at the time prioritized the difference, which is agriculture and stability over the ideals of democracy. within a few years of his reign, India had risen to become the world largest democracy and one of the fast developing economies.
