Answer:
England wanted there money
Explanation:
Answer:
The Brown v. Board of Education was a fundamental role in advancing civil rights because, Linda Brown went to a school with white people. While, she was allowed to go, many white people didn't like her and wanted her out. White people declared that the racial segregation should come into play and, she should leave. When the case came however, the court decided that racial segregation was in fact unconstitutional, which in turn made a huge uproar from the Southerners. While for civil rights it was a enormous step into the right direction for the equal rights that America had promised with their Constitution. This is why Brown v. Board of Education played such a vital role in advancing civil rights.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Rosenbergs were convicted of spying on behalf of the Soviet Union.
No, I think that the sentence was too severe. The Rosenbergs' two sons were orphaned by the executions and were not adopted by any relatives.
One of the sons, Michael Meeropol, wrote The Rosenberg Letters: A Complete Edition of the Prison Correspondence of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. It recited letters exchanged between Ethel Rosenberg and her sons. In the letters, Ethel felt optimistic that she would be released because of her innocence.
Explanation:
The illegal voting would have been stopped or a least greatly reduced with the implementation of proper voter registration and state IDs. Of course, with the rudimentary technology of the era, falsification of ID documents would have been relatively easier than it is today. However IDs and voter registration would have presented an additional obstacle to border ruffians.
The violence would only have been stopped by the concourse of a national guard, a state police and civil deputies from the state protecting voter, voting locations and the transportation of ballots.
Answer:
change "the government" to "a privatized bioengineering company"
Explanation:
Changing the statement that Dr. Jordan received funding from the government to the statement that she received funding from a privatized bioengineering company, would make her story more plausible. This is because as a Bioengineer in the same field, it is easy for her efforts to be recognized by the Bioengineering company who also shares similar goals and objectives with her.
This does not rule out the fact that it is impossible for her to have received funding from the government. But the story would be more plausible if the funding came from a privatized bioengineering company for the above-stated reason.
