Your answers "inacomodate and carrage" are correct.
Answer:
:The Haitian Revolution and the subsequent emancipation of Haiti as an independent state provoked mixed reactions in the United States. This led to uneasiness in the US, instilling fears of racial instability on its own soil and possible problems with foreign relations and trade between the two countries.
US president Thomas Jefferson realized the revolution had the potential to cause an upheaval against slavery in the US not only by slaves, but by white abolitionists as well. Southern slaveholders feared the revolt might spread from the island of Hispaniola to their own plantations. Against this background and with the declared primary goal of maintaining social order in Haiti, the US attempted to suppress the revolution, refusing acknowledgement of Haitian independence until 1862.
The US also embargoed trade with the nascent state. American merchants had conducted a substantial trade with the plantations on Hispaniola throughout the 18th century, the French-ruled territory providing nearly all of its sugar and coffee. However, once the Haitian slave population emancipated itself, the US was reluctant to continue trade for fear of upsetting the evicted French on one hand and its Southern slaveholders on the other.
Against this, there were anti-slavery advocates in northern cities who believed that consistency with the principles of the American Revolution — life, liberty and equality for all — demanded that the US support the Haitian people.
Explanation:
Well, whoever made this question forgot to add in one of the answers, which is the correct one. IT WOULD BE D. Wicked
If the options are:
<span>by using his own personal experiences to gain their trust
by recounting emotional events to evoke sadness
by explaining the reasoning behind his argument
by describing how he plans to effect change in the US
Then the correct answer is C. by explaining the reasoning behind his argument. His reasoning is that a free person should be able to decide for themselves. The logic behind this reasoning is that it is impossible to call someone a freedman, and yet make all the decisions about his life, and choosing whether to punish him or not, and how. If that is what the government wants, he implies, then it does not want black people to be really free.</span>
