The Wilmot Proviso prevented new states from becoming slave states, the compromise enabled them to become slave states if popular sovereignty wanted them to be. California was allowed to become a new, non-slave state, and in return Slavery was enabled and allowed in the south, strengthening fugitive laws even more. To everyone it seemed like a victory for a while.
This is a tricky question, because there was no judicial tribunal or city legislature in pre-Columbian Mexican civilization. The despot would be the monarch became autoritharistic. So I would say the people had some power to limit the authority of the monarch. I don't remember of any case in which the revolt of the people overthrow the <em>tlatoani</em>, the Aztec authority, but they did betray <em>tlatoani</em> Moctezuma, joined the Spanish conquerors and defeated the Aztec empire.
The correct answers are as followed:
1) They often lived in crowded tenements- The poor living conditions of immigrants in America during the late 19th and early 20th centuries was best exemplified by Jacob Riis famous book <em>How the Other Half Lives. </em>This book described and included pictures of the cramped and dirty apartments that immigrants lived in.
2) They generally lived among others who shared their culture.- It was common for immigrants to live in neighborhoods where there were individuals from their same country. This resulted in the development of niche communities within big cities like New York.
The letter a is your answer
The Chavín's special fabric made from llamas was a Inca influence
