Answer:
The Barbarian attacks on Rome led to the fall of the Roman Empire, since the empire was weak at that time. The lesson here is that always be prepared. if they were prepared the Roman Empire might have been safe.
Explanation:
No, feudalism froze the idea of social mobility
Exemplified and failed expansionism
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The United States has almost doubled their territories in the period of around fifty years.
The proportions of the USA not only went up, they also went up in bureaucratic problems synonymous with territorial development in two different purchases, one of Thomas Jefferson in 1803, and the other of James K. Polk in 1848. Still a developing nation, Jefferson encountered a host of challenges in administering such a huge expanse of territory, but deftly transformed the Louisiana Acquisition into one of greatest achievements of the United States.
Rather, Polk gained his territories by means of deviants and refused to see the repercussions of brutal civil war that ultimately would engulf the Union. Two examples of leadership are seen in the United States ' great expansion, Thomas Jefferson's masterful, brave conduct, as opposed to James K. Polk's reckless and hasty behavior.
<span>''Roaring" economy of the 20s meant that investors could make wildly high returns on their investment in relatively small amounts of time, especially since there was practically no government regulation of investment under the Great Depression, which began with the crash of 1929. </span>
Naïve citizens allow corrupt governments.
In literature, <u>situational irony</u> creates a contrast between what the readers might expect and what actually happens in the text. The goal is to shed light on the difference between appearances and the reality, with regard to a particular theme.
Here, the irony is that even though the farm produces more and gains more money, the animals who worked for this progress to happen are not getting the profits of this improvement. All the money goes to the hands of the ruling class (the pigs and the dogs), because the other animals are naïve enough to believe that the rulers' "supervision and organisation" work is enough to justify this unfair wealth distribution.
