Answer:
Even though Tina told her to skip it, Lexie had a nagging feeling in her gut that if she missed her brother's spelling bee, he would be extremely disappointed in her as well as her parents. After a half an hour of going through the list of pros and cons she had written, she called Tina and told her that although she truly did want to go to the show with them, she thought that her family should always come before friends. Tina completely understood and when Jess heard the news, she was disappointed but came to terms with Lexie's decision. As soon as Lexie arrived at the spelling bee competition, her brother's face lit up with pure happiness and joy when he noticed that Lexie was there with their parents. <em>This was the right decision.</em> Lexie thought while she cheered on her brother. At the end of the championship, her brother won and they all went out to celebrate.
class's = owned by one class.
classes's = owned by multiple classes. (usually shortened to classes')
You can't shorter class's so class', however. Here's why:
<em>You can only shorten it when it's a plural noun that ends in an s or when it's a proper noun (names, places) that ends in an s.
</em><em>
</em>So unless there's more than one class, it's class's.<em>
</em>
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
Explanation:
The answer is
God as an artist - Did he smile his work to see
God as a caretaker - Gave thee clothing of delight (Since he takes enough care to give you clothes)
God as powerful - Could frame thy fearful symmetry (fearful means power)
God as a creator - Gave thee life, and bid thee feed (giving life means creator)
