<span>The ideas in the sonnets are similar because both sonnets focus on A) affection. Both these sonnects have a symbol of beauty as something unpleasant, because it is a tool to manipulate with other's hearts and minds. But still, the main idea of both works is affection of this beauty. Both authors point out that beauty can be cruel and unfair, but they can't resist their feelings.</span>
Answer:
1. If the bus will be crowded, she'll have to walk to the office.
2. If he gets up early he will get good health.
3. If she is weak, she will not go out very often.
4. If the sun was in the right direction, the photographs would come out very well.
5. If he watches film by night, he falls asleep by day.
6. If he would be too lazy, as he failed in the examination.
7. If he drives carelessly, he will have a serious accident.
8. If my car breaks down, I will miss the meeting.
9. If he doesn't study hard, he will fail the final exam.
10. If Susan eats too much, she will be overweight.
Answer:
Explanation: there is no facter she dont know
Answer:
Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by
studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.
Explanation:
A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality. He can then arrive at a broad generalization.
A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument. A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails. It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.
In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated. For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.
