Answer:
Carnegie called for treating the workers kindly. “When relations with workers go beyond the letter of the contract, it is always beneficial for the enterprise. Nothing has served the enterprise more than the good attitude of the workers," Carnegie claimed.
The only benefit brought to mankind is the accumulation of wealth by those who have the ability and energy to produce it. In addition, without wealth there can be no Philanthropist. When providing charity, the main consideration should be the desire to help those who then help themselves; give part of the necessary funds by which those who wish to grow will receive this opportunity; provide assistance to those who want to succeed so that they can achieve this. To help only occasionally and never making everything possible. Neither the individual nor the whole of humanity are better off by alms. Worthy help, with rare exceptions, does not require it. Really valuable representatives of humanity never do this, apart from emergencies or sudden changes. These were beliefs of Carnegie.
Explanation:
Providence as we know it, is God's actions and the resources He gives human beings in order for them to survive and develop; in other words, God gives humans the tools needed and required to live a happy and full life.
According to Beveridge, the expansion of <em>America</em> was in accordance with the <em>divine providence</em>; it was mandatory to continue the United Stated expansion into the <em>Philippines</em> and the Pacific Rim. For him, this expansion will ensure and economical and political growth for the United States; this idea was supported by the 19th century Manifest Destiny.
C. tolerance should be the answer
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
Polytheism<span> is belief in many gods — it's kind of the opposite of monotheism, which is belief in one god. If you believe in </span>polytheism<span>, you have a bunch of gods to thank or blame. ... Usually in </span>polytheist<span> religions certain gods are associated with specific things, like war or love.
</span>
-hope this helps :)
