Well even though im not writing the two paragraphs for you, Im going yo give you info about one of the cases so that you can do the paragraphs. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Gibbons v. Ogden is considered a landmark supreme court case on the issue of the Interstate Commerce Clause. Aaron Ogden was given an exclusive license to operate a shipping business within the State of New York. He sued a man named Thomas Gibbons, who ran a competing shipping business between New Jersey and New York City, claiming that Gibbon's operations in the State of New York were illegal.<span>The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Thomas Gibbons. Hope this works good for you. </span>
Answer:
<em>The</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em> </em><em>would be</em><em> </em><em>C</em>
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>helps</em>
The supreme court case, <span>Plessy vs. Ferguson,</span> ruled that "separate was equal," but approximately sixty years later, Brown vs. Board of Education, overturned this ruling on the basis that "separate was not equal."
<span>C the middle ages
</span><span>A Individuals
</span>
<span>FALSE
</span><span>true</span>
Answer:He saw the superiority of the African continent and a chance for Belgium to dominate world trade.
part a -
Explanation:
The Congo became part of Belgium's attempt to be a dominant country in Europe, and luckily, in the world. Acquired the Congo in 1884, Leopold had amassed a huge personal fortune from the exploitation of Congo's natural resources - at first thanks to the export of ivory, but it did not yield as much as expected. As global demand for rubber exploded, attention turned to the labor-intensive gathering of rubber from plant sap. This process of exploration was followed by violent practices with the natives, with extensive use of beatings, killings, and mutilations when production quotas were not reached.
