I would go with B if i were you :) mark me as brainliest?
<u>Analysis of the figures of speech in 'Raider of the treasure trove:</u>
- ‘Raider of the Treasure Trove’ is a pleasing poem by Lade Wosornu which beautifully explains the love, care, and cheerfulness.
- And at the same time it depicts how anger, rage and hatred ruin everything.
- The poet have made use of certain figure of speech in the poem.
- The line ‘Rage drags rags after you’ uses Assonance where the vowel sounds are repeated.
- Here the repetition of vowel sound of ‘a’ is being used. A
- part from this, another figure of speech of personification is being used in the line ‘Rage is thief, Enemy of equanimity.’
- Here rage is given a human attribution of thief and enemy.
Answer:
aiming for better grades next semester
winning an essay contest in English class
doing extra research for history class
Explanation:
hope it helps :)
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
