One way the slaver Haley and the slave George are contrasted with each other through the quality of their speech. Mr Haley was the bad slave owner and George being the slave. George invented the machine to speed the process of cleaning hemp, earning the adoration of the factory's proprietor. Haley removed him from the factory and claimed that George was too lazy to work. George was then sent to work menial labour.
George was forced to take new wife since there were no lawful marriages between slaves because they were not actual citizens. George used to read the bible a lot but one day Mr Shelby sold him to Mr Haley.
Apex .. He was dethroned duke of Milan by his own brother
Can I have Branliest for the Correct Answer?
Very often things like flashbacks, flash forwards, non-linear narratives, multiple plots and ensemble casts are regarded as optional gimmicks stuck into the conventional three act structure. They're not. Each of the six types I've isolated and their subcategories provides a different take on the same story material. Suddenly, one idea for a film can give you a multitude of story choices. What do I mean?
More than six ways to turn your idea into a film. Let's imagine that you've read a newspaper article about soldiers contracting a respiratory disease from handling a certain kind of weaponry. You want to write a film about it. Conventional wisdom says create one storyline with one protagonist (a soldier who gets the disease) and follow that protagonist through a three act linear journey. There's no question that you could make a fine film out of that. But there are several other ways to make a story out of the idea, and several different messages that you could transmit - by using one of the parallel narrative forms.
<span>Would you like to create a script about a group of soldiers from the same unit who contract the disease together during one incident, with their relationships disintegrating or improving as they get sicker, dealing with the group dynamic and unfinished emotional business? That would be a shared team 'adventure', which is a kind of group story, so you would be using what I call </span>Multiple Protagonist<span> form (the form seen in films like Saving Private Ryan or The Full Monty or Little Miss Sunshine, where a group goes on a quest together and we follow the group's adventure, the adventure of each soldier, and the emotional interaction of each soldier with the others). </span>
Alternatively, would you prefer your soldiers not to know each other, instead, to be in different units, or even different parts of the world, with the action following each soldier into a separate story that shows a different version of the same theme, with all of the stories running in parallel in the same time frame and making a socio-political comment about war and cannon fodder? If so, you need what I call tandem narrative,<span> the form of films like Nashville or Traffic. </span>
Alternatively, if you want to tell a series of stories (each about a different soldier) consecutively, one after the other, linking the stories by plot or theme (or both) at the end, you'll need what, in my book Screenwriting Updated I called 'Sequential Narrative', but now, to avoid confusion with an approach to conventional three act structure script of the same name, I term Consecutive Stories<span> form, either in its fractured state (as in Pulp Fiction or Atonement), or in linear form (as in The Circle). </span>
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
There are differences between the Qin dynasty and the Rana regime or dynasty. Some of which includes
1. Qin dynasty is the first dynasty in China and it lasted between 221 to 206 BCE. Rana dynasty was a dynasty in the Kingdom of Nepal and it lasted between 1846 to 1951
2. Qin dynasty was famous for the achievement of the Great Wall and a large army of Terracotta Warriors.
While Rana of Regime was famous for the massive production of raw materials exported from Nepal in huge quantities. These raw materials were sent abroad in trading activities in Europe through the seaport.
<span>Using these words allows Hamilton to describe the powers of these branches of government in familiar terms so that he can then contrast them with the powers he envisions for an independent judiciary.
</span><span>By expressing complete certainty in his position, Hamilton presents his argument in favor of an independent judiciary as one to which no logical objection exists.
</span>
