<span>Good Morning!
You forgot the alternatives. I found them on the web ...
A. The public voting for candidates based on religious affiliations
B. The president rewarding political supporters with appointments to desirable positions
C. The federal government recruiting volunteers to serve abroad the ambassadors
D. Legislators awarding government contracts to the lowest bidders
-
What was happening at the time was a system of patronage. The qualification of individuals was not taken into account, but their party affiliation and contribution to the political campaign of the elect. Thus, the absence of merit caused a deterioration in the state's workforce.
Hugs!</span>
The correct answer is A) Johanan Ben Zakkai. Hope this helps.
Answer:
Nativists viewed immigrants as a cultural and economic threat- This is due to the fact that many immigrants were willing to work for lower wages than American citizens.
Nativists didn't believe immigrants could adopt US cultures and values. - Many Americans feared that the nice communities developing in cities like New York would only continue to feed these immigrants "refusal" to adapt American ideas.
Nativists pressued politicians to limit immigration- The nativists were successful in this, as the federal government passed the Immigration Act of 1924 which limited immigration.
Explanation:
The people who they call 'muckrakers' tried to help them out, one even made a book about it
Answer:
The look of the credit card
