1) <span> The specific differences that I noticed in the two performances mentioned above are that t</span>he first one was very touching and totally emotional, I bet that the author wanted to make us go through this perfomance in the shouse of the characters but because of this decision it was kind of hard to concentrate on the words. In the seconfd performance these two points (emotional and textual) are balanced so it was more holistic.
2) The way how Michael Pennington reaches out to you as the audience in his performance of Hamlet's soliloquy is his personal attitude he expressed to those who came to watch it by looking right at the camera while delivering his soliloquy.
3) There is no photo or excerpt of the page that you have to analyze, and I can depend only on the Speech: “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” from Julius Caesar, spoken by Marc Antony. I think that any of line should be rid, or changed in tone, because this is the major point that shapes and reveals the Antony's character who is considered as a <span>superficial man.
Hope that helps!</span>
the answer is D all refrigerated delivery trucks were required to have a record keeping thermometer mounted inside .
Answer:
Explanation:
I recieved your letter yesterday
Answer:
<h3>Kinesics.</h3>
Explanation:
In a non-verbal communication, the dimension of kinesics involve bodily movements and facial expressions like frequent eye contacts. This dimension may also occur in terms of hand gestures, voice change, and active facial expressions.
These dimensions of non-verbal communication can be easily interpreted just by understanding the behavior of the other person. It is based on cognitive observation. Similarly, after noticing the my date is using animated vocalics, increased eye contact, and active facial expressions, it can be interpreted that she is interested and excited to be with me.
Perhaps take from my answer. Sorry if this isn't good, i'm a bit tired. You can add on and change up the words. I was unsure what was exactly wanted for this.
Answer:
Hello, as the speaker of this, I say the motion is correct. Modern movies are run by acting and scripts, while people are off script and anything could truly happen. Younger people tend to leach from what they see on T.V. and from elders, thus certain movies may give them bad views. Say with common action movies: That would most likely give the person a taste of violence as an answer. Humans can be violent, but are not always fighting like how thrillers and action movies show. People do break out into fights, just not like that. If someone was trying to figure out how some commonly interact and behave from a movie, it wouldn't be a good choice, since that would provide the wrong view. Unless it's a documentary or educational film, modern movies do indeed give a bad model. It is understandable for others to have different opinions on this matter, this is my own. Thank you for your time.
