Man has the ability to reason.
Why I don't think the others are correct:
The author's focus never indicates a singular person. While the author did mention the tiger's ability to terrorize, the author does not go as far to claim the tiger is a menace.
An in depth study of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein would not be a short research paper. Ideally you would have to have a more specific research question/focus on one aspect of the novel. An in depth study is too broad.
An analysis of protagonists in Jane Austen's works once again would not be a short research paper, if it was limited to one or two of her books then yes but not all of them.
A comparison of Homers Illiad and Odyssey once again is too broad a topic and if you were to compare everything in both novels you would be looking at a rather lengthy research paper.
Moby D*ck is full of symbolism and if you could find a way to summarize effectively and succinctly the story and maybe just focus on the actual whale as the subject matter and what it represents in the book you could definitely make a good relatively short research paper out of it.
Alternatively would be an analysis of Edgar Allan Poe's narrative style in The Black Cat. The Black Cat is a short story and ideal for this type of research paper.
Answer:D the man is amazed father would help for free
Explanation:
<span>The epigrams from the Oscar Wilde’s play “The
Importance of being Earnest” are first and last statement. Epigram is a brief, satiric,
memorable statement which expresses an idea in an amusing way. Oscar Wild used
epigrams to expose the hypocrisy of upper class from Victorian era. In the first
statement ( "In married life three is company and two is none." (Algernon))
Wilde alludes that marriage is a business deal containing property, wealth, and
status. In the last statement (“More than half of modern culture depends on
what one shouldn’t read.”) Wilde makes fun of the whole Victorian idea of
morality, strict codes of what people should and shouldn’t do.</span>