The complete question is as follow:
Students on a college campus were recently surveyed about the upcoming presidential election. By and large, they agreed with the statement "College affordability is one of our top priorities." Many students stated that they had a difficult time funding their education.
<span>Which prediction can most likely be made based on this scenario?
</span>
The answer is
"Students will most probably vote for those presidential
candidates who prioritize lessening tuition expenditures".As student’s primary concern in the premise is College
affordability which logically leads to the prediction stated above, the
one who will meet their demand is the one who most probably will get their vote.
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
A short-term job or work project that can be paid or unpaid, that can most likely lead to a full-time paying position is called an internship! Internships are great to gain experience in a field you might be interested in working in!
President Carter's attempts to free the hostages were done in good faith and effort, but were hampered by failures in communication, delivery and execution. The plan involved servicemen who were not as well-trained as they could have been and certain weather effects like the "haboob" which was a big dust cloud, doomed the mission. Carter does deserve credit for taking responsibility for the failure however.
<span>English became one of the most widely spoken languages in India.</span>
