Answer:hindsight bias
Explanation:Hindsight bias is a term used in psychology to explain the tendency of people to overestimate their ability to have predicted an outcome that could not possibly have been predicted.
example of hindsight bias is when people are wrong about the outcome of an event, but claim they knew it was going to go the opposite way to which they originally stated.
The correct answer is "Related".
Explanation:
In terms of grammar, we call a true sentence to that sentence that is factually correct. In that sense, the word "related" makes the sentence the truest one and it is more accurate to use that one. In terms of social, the word "related" makes the connection between the two people who are family.
Answer:
Overall Sammy's speech style is of modern nature influenced by the pop and hippie culture with a fear of commitment.
Explanation:
By analyzing the language of Sammy it is observed that Sammy has a overall witty nature where he is self aware and considers himself as of a superior specie than the mankind.
- His use of word witch in para 1 and the subsequent anger highlights the self awareness and how high he considers himself in his own point of view.
When talking to the girls for the first time, indicates a different side of Sammy which is more loving, romantic and has a sense of enjoyment.
- He often uses words as Darling, Sweet heart while calling the women.
Throughout the story it is also evident that the emphasis is given more towards the talking as compared to listening. This is also highlighting his self centric attitude towards the life and has a careless attitude which is covered with the facade.
In addition there is usage of slangs at different paras which highlights his modern and care-free attitude.
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
