answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slamgirl [31]
2 years ago
5

Which statement accurately contrasts how Judaism and Christianity developed? A. Judaism developed through the growth of a single

nation of people, while Christianity developed through followers spreading the religion throughout the world. B. Judaism developed from the growth of polytheism, while Christianity developed through the development of theocracy. C. Judaism developed through the spread of the Greek language, while Christianity developed through the Roman occupation of Jerusalem. D. Judaism developed through the persecution of the Jewish people, while Christianity developed through the lack of persecution of its followers.
History
2 answers:
maw [93]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A. Judaism developed through the growth of a single nation of people, while Christianity developed through followers spreading the religion throughout the world.

Explanation:

<u>Judaism</u> is the millennial religion of a single nation of people: the Hebrew people. In this sense, Judaism is not a universal religion, it means that, while it is not impossible for non-Jews to convert to Judaism, <u>Jews does not seek to convert other people to Judaism</u> because it is only practiced by those who are born within the Hebrew people.

<u>Christianity</u>, on the other hand, was born as a branch of Judaism in the 1st century AD, and it was born as a universal religion, meaning that <u>Christians of every century tried to spread their beliefs across the world</u>. Christians practitioners in charge of spreading the Christian message to non-Christians are known as missionaries. For this reason, Christianity expanded through almost every continent to the point of becoming the largest religion (or set of religions) in the world today.

Alex Ar [27]2 years ago
5 0
I believe that the answer would be A because there was a whole country of people who were Jews, and then you have Christain missionaries spreading the word of Christ.

Have a great day and I hope that my answer could help you! Have a blessed day love and happy late Memorial Day!
You might be interested in
A. Identify ONE regional difference depicted in the chart. B. Briefly explain ONE
asambeis [7]

Answer:

if im right the answer is 1800

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Amanda wants to buy a new car. What questions should she ask before she makes the purchase? Select three options. Do I need this
Anna007 [38]

She should ask these three questions;

1) Do I need this car or should I use my old car a little longer?

2) Is this a reliable vehicle?

3) Will buying this car prevent me from saving money to buy a house?

All of these options are related to the financial planning which is the most logical and apt thing to consider when buying an expensive item, the other options are not relevant to the scenario.  


6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following enabled mass production in the 1920s?
Marina86 [1]
It was the "c. introduction of the assembly line" that enabled mass production in the 1920s, since this meant that products could be made with a division of labor. 
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what ways did the Haitian revolution produce equality? What were the limits of this equality?
anygoal [31]

Answer: The Haitian revolution produced equality in the form of being the most successful slave revolution in history, but, it collapsed on itself shortly after.

Explanation: It produced no gender equality, and Dessalines, the ruler of Haiti, ordered the killing of thousands of white inhabitants as "revenge." After they ran out of whites to kill, the slaves turned their anger to the <em>Affranchis</em>, the wealthy people of color. Soon, freed slaves were the majority of the population in a free and "equal" land.

8 0
2 years ago
"What warrant [right] have we to take that land, which is and hath been of long time possessed [by] others . . . ? "That which i
amm1812

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

"What warrant [right] have we to take that land, which is and hath been of long time possessed [by] others . . . ? "That which is common to all is proper to none. [Native Americans] ruleth over many lands without title or property; for they enclose [fence in] no ground, neither have they cattle to maintain it. . . . And why may not Christians have liberty to go and dwell amongst them in their waste[d] lands and woods (leaving them such places as they have [fertilized] for their corn) . . . ? For God hath given to the sons of men a twofold right to the earth; there is a natural right and a civil [political] right. The first right was natural when men held the earth in common, every man sowing and feeding where he pleased. Then, as men and cattle increased, they appropriated some parcels of ground by enclosing [them as property] . . . And this in time got them a civil right."

Descreva brevemente UM argumento apresentado no trecho.

Answer:

Since Native Americans did not claim their civil rights over the land they inhabit, what counts is the natural right that God gave to all men, so it is justifiable for Christians to own the land together with the natives.

Explanation:

The text shown in the question above was written by John Winthrop, who was part of the English team to be the first settlers of North America and later became governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In this text, Winthrop takes a position on the colonists' dictate to live in America, even though it is a land that already had inhabitants and "owners.

In that text, Winthrop claims that God gave men the natural direction over the land, where any land owned them all. Men, through their activities, assumed civil rights over pieces of land, where they became owners and could prevent anyone other than them from using it. However, Native Americans have never claimed civil rights to their land, which allows natural law to prevail and makes room for good Christians to own it.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does malcolm x call uncle sam a hypocrite?
    5·2 answers
  • If an idea is restated in a nonfiction article, what does this most likely signal for the reader?
    10·2 answers
  • The excerpt most reflects which Enlightenment idea?
    7·2 answers
  • Arrange the events in the order in which they occurred.
    15·2 answers
  • 40 Points, need answered quick.
    5·2 answers
  • Highlight evidence that supports Las Casas's claim that the Spanish abused the American Indians. Which of the following reasons
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a function of wetlands?
    11·2 answers
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    11·2 answers
  • Uscovilca led the Chancas into battle, even though he was dead. What does this reveal about their attitudes towards death?
    9·1 answer
  • How does imperialism continue after independence?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!