A character trait of Samantha that is implied in the excerpt is that she is funny
Answer:
Because science, art and culture flourished
Explanation:
The Renaissance is a period of flourishing in the field of culture, science and art, which is characteristic for the period from the end of the 14th to the end of the 16th century. Higher availability of books and study of ancient writers gradually change people's awareness of themselves and the environment that surrounds them.
Numerous wars and an unstable political situation also reflected changes in the Catholic Church whose authority was shaken. Changes were also triggered by geographical discoveries, which, in addition to the exchange of cultures and the development of science, also encouraged eurocentrism, which led to the economic and therefore demographic recovery of the Old Continent at the expense of the New.
Most of the population lives in the countryside, but the population in cities is increasing rapidly. With the greater influx of wealth, the image of society changes with emergence of the middle class and by strengthening the influence of citizenship.
Answer:
Explanation:
Northern Italian cities like Venice and Milan; became very wealthy through trade because they were located in the middle of the Mediterranean.
10. The Venetians and Ottomans were trade partners because It was beneficial to both of them
11. Italy was "primed for the Renaissance" because It had money
12. The Venetians exported Textiles to the Ottomans. They were usually woven in other cities like Florence .that were so valuable because their color remained vibrant.That is because they were dyed with a chemical called alum, which was primarily found in Anatolia, located in the Ottoman Empire.
The Ottomans could provide Italian scholars with many of the Greek and Roman texts they wanted because
Answer:
The correct answer is C. In Tinker v. Des Moines Justice Fortas argues that it would be obvious that students' rights are violated "if a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding discussion of the Vietnam conflict . . . except as part of a prescribed classroom exercise."
Explanation:
The opinion of Justice Fortas, which corresponds to the majority position of the Court in the case, establishes that the prohibition to students to discuss positions regarding the Vietnam War is clearly in violation of the students' rights to express their opinions, which is framed in the right to freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
