The correct answers are B&D; They deliberately ignored the suffering of the parish children. They wanted to give the impression that they were performing their work.
Further Explanation:
After reading the excerpt it can be concluded that the evidence was checked in a rapid/speedy manner and they disregarded the dangers the children were in. This shows that they wanted to give the impression they were doing their job without actually putting any effort into finding out the truth of the goings on.
They knew that the children were being overlooked and they all turned a blind eye to the abuses being dealt to the children. Since the jury would ask troublesome questions and the parishioners signing just to be rebellious this shows that the parish children were being deliberately ignored and their suffering was looked over.
Learn more about Oliver Twist at brainly.com/question/1328411
#LearnwithBrainly
<span>in searching for something better, one may lose what one already has</span>
Answer:
<em> </em><em>The conflict between Nora and Helmer shows how gender roles were defined, as Helmer has complete control over everything, including what the couple discusses.</em>
Explanation:
<em>Doll`s House</em> written by Henrik Ibsen gives us exact social picture of that age. Nora and Torvald Helmer are married. He has a high position in society and he is the leading man of the house. Nora`s role is to be sweet, pretty wife with whom he can show off to the society. Their roles are predestined with expectations of society, if they want to be accepted, they have to play them. Helmer calls Nora with names like <em>squirrel</em> or <em>little bird</em>, in one moment he even marks her as his pet who spends a lot of money. He decides what she will eat or dress or even talk. We can say that Nora even uses her inferior position to get some power. She acts like a damsel in distress so to challenge him to help her in some meaningless activities in which he will feel like a man in charge, but for the biggest part of the play, she was not aware that using her subordinate position for some little and short term pleasures leaves her in that same position which is just being someone`s mannequin.
Not sure I believe the answer would be a
Answer:
relevance
Explanation:
Mr Young argument that he studied his notes and chapters for 18 hours before taking the exam and yet did not get good grade and thought he deserved a higher grade fails the standard of relevance. His argument is not important to the subject matter and lacks the existence to make the subject matter a fact. You can study for as long as you want, but there are other factors that determines good grades that Mr. Young did not consider, such as ability to retain information, intelligence level, and others.
