Question

Use the following magazine article excerpt to answer the question. Did Ronald Reagan’s approach to economics work? Would the same approach work today? Nearly thirty-five years after former President Reagan launched an attack on government spending and taxation, people are wondering if the same approach could be applied in light of today’s circumstances. During Reagan’s term, inflation was indeed suppressed. The tax cuts did seem to impact and proceed the end of the recession. But, the government didn’t stop spending. In fact, the federal debt grew nearly tripled while Regan was in office. Supply-side economics proposes that when the supply of money, labor and services increase economic growth will naturally follow. The subject of the article might eliminate which of these groups as its intended audience? young children people who are funded by government grants a student of economics

Answer 1

Answer:

Young children is correct!

Explanation:

The other two are wrong so process of elimination judges that its "young children".

Credit goes to: Easheatkpaa3h6

Answer 2

I would say young children.
a student of economics could learn from this article
-people who are funded by government grants shouldn't be effected. At least it doesn't say anything about that being effected
-young children probably would not want to read this
so that means that the intended audience is not young children