Hello!
In linguistics, we recognise 4 types of arguments, and two of them are experience, and examples; therefore, in this case, correct answer is: The Narrators growth can contrast naive views with the harsh realities of war.
Hope this helps
Answer:
They Traveled long distances through harsh conditions and some didn't even Get Gold
Explanation:
This is an opinion unless the author states this fact.
Probably a little too late, but "Brenton's poem includes the expected comparisons to the beauty of his wife's hair and mouth, but he goes beyond praising mere physical beauty to create a comparison about her thoughts. Brenton's poem reveals a modern outlook with his inclusion of less expected parts: her eyelashes, brows, and waist. Both Shakespeare and Spenser stick to the usual body parts: hair, eyes, cheeks, and breast. All express their love, but Shakespeare portrays his loved one as a "real" woman, not a perfect woman. Brenton's wife seems more real than Spenser's, who is idealized the most with rich comparisons like gold, rubies, and pearls. Brenton's poem also uses more modern and unexpected comparison: "the waist of an otter," "teeth like the tracks of white mice on the white earth," "shoulders of champagne." His images are more vivid because they are less familiar.
Answer: "Her husband emerges from the light and comes toward her, taller than the palms, walking on water"
Explanation:
Magical Realism refers to the amalgamation of magical as well as realistic elements into a story. Essentially, reality is explained by magical or fantastic concepts meaning the story is neither completely fantasy neither is it completely real.
Evidence of Magic Realism in the above is,
"Her husband emerges from the light and comes toward her, taller than the palms, walking on water"
The is magic realism because her late husband Jorge, appearing from a beam of light is not realistic but supernatural yet it happened to her as she sat on her porch.
