All categories

2 years ago

A constitutional monarchy provides what power to a monarch?

2 answers:

5 0

The answer is D. A constitutional monarchy only provides power for a monarchy only in the form of power in the constitution.

nordsb [41]2 years ago

4 0

A constitutional monarchy provides only power in the constitution to a monarch. In a constitutional monarchy, political power is divided between the king and a constitutionally organized government such as a parliament.

EXPLANATION

A constitutional monarchy is a government form where a king or a queen acts as a leader or head of the state. A king or queen rules the state within the written and unwritten constitutional parameters. Constitutional monarchy is different from absolute monarchy. Constitutional monarchy holds all power over the government and the people. Some countries which apply modern constitutional monarchies are England, Canada, Sweden, and Japan.

Here are three important points to know about Constitutional Monarchy:

• A constitutional monarchy is government form where the non-elected monarch serves as the head of state within the limits of a constitution.

• A constitutional monarchy is different to an absolute monarchy because the constitutional monarchy has full power over the government and the citizens.

• Constitutional monarchy’s political power is shared between an organized government like the British Parliament and the monarch.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Because Napoleon supported many ideals of the Enlightenment and began instituting symbols and titles from the monarchy, historians later classified him as

brainly.com/question/8935385

KEYWORD: Constitutional Monarchy, Monarch, government

Subject: History

Class: 10 - 12

Subchapter: Constitutional Monarchy

You might be interested in

why has increasing farm production failed to help prevent malnutrition and famine in developing nations?A. most of those increas

PSYCHO15rus [73]

The correct answer would be alternative A) "most of those increases in agriculture are cash crops reserved for export."

The increase of production of crops doesn't benefit the hungry, as the crops are not meant for them. They're destined to exportation. For this reason, the hungry don't get anything from the increase in production.

One of the ways to prevent hunger in developing countries would be to have this crops used for social programs, and distribute food to the hungry. However, that's not the way it's done.

6 0

2 years ago

A boy, age twelve, had friends who convinced him to carry a gun to a robbery. No one was injured in the robbery, and the boy nev

dsp73

<span>The boy's counsel could argue that the sentence is cruel and unusual punishment. This is prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. The boy does not have the judgment of an adult and cannot be punished as an adult. In fact, even if the boy were an adult, life in prison could be a cruel or unusual sentence.</span>

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement best describes Spanish Louisiana after the American Revolution? Most African Americans who lived in the region w

vovangra [49]

Answer: C. It was the least prosperous region due to lack of available labor.

Explanation:

3 0

1 year ago

How did the tariffs controversy expose sectional differences between the North and South?

vitfil [10]

The correct answer is number 2) the North manufactured goods to sell mainly to the Southern states, but the South preferred imports.

The tariffs controversy exposed sectional differences between the North and the South in that the North manufactured goods to sell mainly to the Southern states, but the South preferred imports.

The Congress of the United States passed the Tariff 0f 1828 on May 19, in order to protect the production of goods in the country, specifically in the states of the North. But Southern states immediately opposed to the act, heading by South Carolina, that considered the decision as to the "Tariff of Abominations," because the act set a 38% tax of most imported good. This represented a negative impact on the economy of the Southern states.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

4. The main arguments of the two sources are most similar in their emphasis on the (A) importance of European-manufactured expor

EastWind [94]

Answer:

(D) significance of European access to precious metals from the Americas

(B) different economic relationships that specific European states had with Asia

Explanation:

The statement above was the main argument of the two source. One was talking about the Europeans ability to use the american Silver ware in all their purchases thereby giving them an edge. <em>The second argument was on the Western Europe being better placed to profit from the vast goods and services from the Asian continent than other European region.</em>

8 0

2 years ago