answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
2 years ago
12

While the spanish were occupied expelling muslims, portugal was?

History
1 answer:
ki77a [65]2 years ago
4 0

The answer is - occupied with exploration.

While the Spanish still had problems with the Muslims and were giving their best to expel them, the Portuguese did not have problems of this type, so they were free to develop their economy and perform explorations. Because of the explorations Portugal made, they were able to find out new routes to the east, this meant free trade by their own terms, which led to increasing of the wealth of the country, and thus making it one of the most powerful countries in the world. Also because of their explorations, the Portuguese managed to get hold on to new territories and colonize them.

You might be interested in
Summarize the recommendations that Marqués de Rubi made after his survey of the northern borderlands of Spanish territory
Savatey [412]

Answer:

I'm really hoping that this helps you.

Explanation:

King Carlos III appointed Rubí inspector of frontier presidios on August 7 of the following year and commissioned him to address economic inequalities and other urgent matters. Rubí went to Mexico City in mid-December 1765 when informed of his commission, and remained in the capital until March 1766, when he obtained his orders from Viceroy Cruillas. Rubí set out for his inspection on March 12 Rubí set out for his examination on 12 March, traveling first to Querétaro, then to Zacatecas. On April 14, Nicolás de Lafora, his engineer and mapmaker, accompanied him in Durango, keeping a diary of the trip, as did Rubí himself. A copy of Rubí's previously unpublished journal was uncovered in 1989, when it was contained in a volume of bound documents collected by the Barker Texas History Centre.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
View this quote from the decision in marbury v. madison. it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to
Butoxors [25]

Marbury v. Madison marked the moment that the Supreme Court established itself as a co-equal branch of government.

In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court carved out a space where it declared that it had the ability to review laws to determine whether they were constitutional.

While the Supreme Court rarely knocked a law down as unconstitutional in the 1800s, everyone now knew that they could. This quote, as I have said elsewhere, is the Supreme Court stating that the Judicial branch determines what the law is and isn't.

5 0
2 years ago
If mr. smith takes a case all the way to the supreme court concerning his being unlawfully jailed, he is trying to see that a wr
Nikolay [14]

The correct answer is redress.

Redressing is a process in which an individual tries to get the ruling of a previous court case changed. This process involves a system of appeals, with the Supreme Court being the highest court of appeals in the country. Any ruling that results from a Supreme Court trumps any state law currently in place. This is because the Supreme Court is the most powerful court in the United States of America.

If Mr. Smith won his case, it would set a new precedent (example) in the United States.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the space provided, compare and contrast the Puritan governments of Massachusetts and Connecticut. Evaluate the effectiveness
Maslowich

Answer:

The Puritan government of Massachusetts was neither a democracy nor a theocracy. Massachusetts had aspects of both.The religious laws were  dominant over most laws in the state. However, they didn't have one ruler. The only people who could vote were the "freemen."

   The Puritan government of Connecticut  was controlled by King Charles II of England. He gave the governor the "executive" power. Puritan was the only religion allowed. It was part of an extended monarchy.

5 0
2 years ago
Is a totalitarian government always absolutist?<br> Yes or No
slamgirl [31]

A democracy is a society in which people have a say in their government and elect their leaders. The opposite is totalitarianism: a totalitarian society is usually ruled by a dictator, and there is very little or no freedom. In totalitarianism, the government controls almost every aspect of life.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Senatorial elections are not held at the end of every six-year term. They are actually scattered over the six-year term so that
    11·2 answers
  • Which is an accurate description of a tactic used by the Cherokees to keep white settlers from taking Their land
    5·1 answer
  • The development of the shipbuilding and cod fishing industries during the colonial era would have had the GREATEST impact on whi
    9·1 answer
  • Identify three ways that erasmus contrasts the church leaders of his day with the apostles
    15·1 answer
  • Which situation describes a historian using rhetoric?
    11·2 answers
  • Excerpt: “By the 1770s, the ideas of the Great Awakening had helped create a revolutionary fervor among the colonists, which led
    11·1 answer
  • Describe how ethnic and nationalist movements emerged and spread as the Soviet Union collapsed
    7·1 answer
  • According to John Maynard Keynes, what was the main cause of the Great Depression?
    8·1 answer
  • A woman was born in 1916, but she just celebrated her 26th birthday in 2020. Explain how this is possible using just two words.
    7·1 answer
  • how is the perspective of Mr.Todd different from the perspective of the report from the pacific institute?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!