Answer:He saw the superiority of the African continent and a chance for Belgium to dominate world trade.
part a -
Explanation:
The Congo became part of Belgium's attempt to be a dominant country in Europe, and luckily, in the world. Acquired the Congo in 1884, Leopold had amassed a huge personal fortune from the exploitation of Congo's natural resources - at first thanks to the export of ivory, but it did not yield as much as expected. As global demand for rubber exploded, attention turned to the labor-intensive gathering of rubber from plant sap. This process of exploration was followed by violent practices with the natives, with extensive use of beatings, killings, and mutilations when production quotas were not reached.
Here are the correct answers
1) Many other nations took advantage of the absence of a strong central government- This was due to the fact that there was no strong leadership existed in the form of a president. When making this constitution, Americans feared that a president would be too much like a King.
2)There was no authority to make the states comply with Congressional laws-No provisions were made for a national court.
3) Congress had to borrow founds from foreign governments-Congress was not allowed to raise money through taxes. This lack of ability to tax was caused by American citizens anger towards taxation without representation, something they encountered while under the control of Great Britain.
4) Trade disputes arose between states- Congress couldn't control interstate commerece.
Answer: Broadsides
Don't have too much context on Art Appreciation for me to give you an eloquent explanation on that one. Sorry haha
Ralph Waldo Emerson
The quote "Whoso is a man must be a nonconformist" is from Emerson's "Self-Reliance".
Emerson's essay "Self-Reliance" was published in 1842 and argued the benefits of self-reliance as a trait. He argued people should develop self-reliance and compared it to forms of conformity.
<span>A protectorate is a form of colonial rule that allows the region to govern themselves, but still receive protection benefits. Direct rule is in regards to a colonial power having direct control over the laws and legislation of the society in question. Indirect is a more hands-off approach, but still allows the colonial power to have complete control without being physically present.</span>