If the options are:
A. Viewers would have to infer the emotions and motivations of Ben and Regina.
B. Viewers would have to envision the physical descriptions of Ben and Regina.
C. Viewers would have to imagine the few props being used by Ben and Regina.
<span>D. Viewers would have to visualize the actions and movements of Ben and Regina.
</span>
Then the right answer is A. In stage and film adaptations, there is no need for the viewers to envision physical descriptions, imagine props, or visualize actions and movements. They can already see all of that, as the directors have already taken care of it. We only have to visualize all these things when we read the play. However, inferring the inner enigmas of characters' motivations is still up to us.
"And on the point now in question seems to be altogether blind and babbling" seems to sum up the opinion of the ancient Greeks and their studies of processes like the motion of matter perhaps because at that time of history of the classical learning much of it was based on pure speculation without going out and getting one's hands dirty and really perceiving phenomena with one's 5 senses as Georgius Agricola did in going down in underground mines to find out firsthand how mining was carried out.
Answer:
.....is not only difficult, but also dangerous.....
Explanation:
It´s not a good idea to ride a bike on a flat tire, instead you should buy a new flat and replace it immediately. If you insist in riding on around on a flat tire (this task will not be that easy to do), you probably will destroy your bike definitely and put yourself and others at serious risk of having an accident. ..... for both you and your bike."
Why does Edwards claim that nonbelievers are akin to spiders in "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God"?
<span>II. Spiders are powerless should a rock fall on them.
</span>
The passage states that a spider's web is not strong enough to stop a falling rock. Its home will be destroyed and the spider must rebuild his web again.
