The complete question is:
Which closing sentences to a story best show a character reflecting on a larger meaning found in a conflict?
A. As a night person, i learned that i could never take a job working in a bakery because i would have to change in a way that is unacceptable to me.
B. I enjoyed getting up early in the morning and loved seeing the smiles i brought to the faces of those who enjoy bakery treats.
C. As an early bird who doesn't mind rising before dawn, i "got the worm" and found my true calling in life as a baker's apprentice.
D. I accepted a job in a bakery despite being a night owl and having to rise before dawn, but i learned that adaptability is often necessary to achieve one's goals.
Answer:
The correct option is D.
Explanation:
I accepted a job in a bakery despite being a night owl and having to rise before dawn, but i learned that adaptability is often necessary to achieve one's goals.
This is a closing sentences to a story that best show a character reflecting on a larger meaning found in a conflict.
"Yet the Lord so upheld these persons, as in this general calamity they were not at all infected either with sickness, or lameness."
"And I doubt not but their recompense is with the Lord."
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>
Can I have ur number mami
Which of the following is the LEAST important activity when protecting human subjects in international research?
A. Determining if the research might present unique risks to subjects given local socio-economic conditions.
B. Considering local customs, norms, and laws.
C. Assessing transportation conditions
D. Consulting with members of the community from which subjects will be recruited.
Answer:
The least important activity when protecting human subjects in international research is assessing transportation conditions.
Explanation:
- Some of the other important activities when protecting human subjects in international research are determining if the research might present unique risks to subjects given local socio-economic conditions
- Considering local customs, norms, and laws because proper international research should check whether we are following the laws, basic rules and all the other formalities.
- It should be consulting with members of the community from which subjects will be recruited.
- Assessing transportation conditions also important but when we comparing it to the other activities it is least important.
