1. Planned action - plot
2. iceberg accident - South Pole
3. first to spot the monster and win the reward - Ned Land
4. separating the whole into its parts - criticism
5. Vigo Bay - "Nemo's 'bank'"
6. run aground "incident" - Straits of Torres
7. does not intrude with comment - self-effacing author
8. not restricted by time, place, or character - omniscient
9. resolving action - denouement
10. narrator of Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea - Aronnax
Hope I helped.
(Brainliest would be greatly appreciated!)
Answer:
The answer is yes. Melville is really criticizing the Christian Missionaries.
Explanation:
Because he uses many biblical, scientific, and mythological themes to built his story. The lighting -rod man is a representation of the missionares, while the narrator represents Melville beliefs. The center idea of the story is that the christianism convertion is destroying the cultures, values, and customs established before. The convertion is not about real spiritually, but about imposing the missionaries way of living. The narrator tries to dissuade his neighbors from believing in the lightining rod man, Melville believes in a God full of love and not in a God or religion imposed by fear.
Answer: "By connecting the meaning with a symbol or image" and "Through indirect comments from the narrator".
Explanation: When you imply the meaning of something, you convey the message in a subtle, indirect or symbolic way. Having a character or the narrator point out the meaning is explanation, not implication.
The answer is...... F hope I helped
