answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lozanna [386]
2 years ago
14

What are millers arguments against those who claim that the Roman republic was a top down system

History
2 answers:
Nonamiya [84]2 years ago
8 0

Miller claims that in Roman political System, the power of the people upheld the Political process. This means that the Roman Republic already used Democracy as their Governmental system. In such a way, more power and freedom of choice was given to people through the process of elections. They could influence the political cource of the Republic.

lara [203]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Millar’s claim against those who claim that the Roman Republic was a “top down” system was that the power of the people upheld the political process in the Roman Political System. Moreover, the Roman Republic used Democracy to give more freedom and power to people through elections.  

You might be interested in
In a well-rounded paragraph, describe the origins of the scientific revolution in 16th-century Europe and analyze its impact on
Nimfa-mama [501]
The 16th century saw the origins of the scientific revolution in Europe especially centred in the Rennaisance in Italy. Economically this was a response to the burgeoning trade in the Mediterranean between Italian ports and Middle Eastern and North African countries and under the tutelage of rich powerful families like the Medicis and also the transition from feudalism of the Middle Ages to the nascent capitalism in Europe. The geocentric theory of the earth was challenged by Galileo (Italian )and Copernicus (Polish) as a result of the intellectual foment brought in with capitalism. In mining, Georgius Agricola, who was trained as a physician began first-hand investigation of underground mines in the Erzgebirge Mts of Bohemia and wrote the treatise on this called De Re Metallica which was the authority on such mining/milling techniques for 200 years after. This was made possible by  the  personal investigation of the mines and discussion with the miners and mine managers which was a big break from the classical scholars who often merely speculated on things.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which conclusion can you best draw about mercantilism? (1 point)
alexgriva [62]
Which conclusion can you best draw about mercantilism, And it is B. Colonies provided an economic benefit to parent countries.

Answer will help you.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List two pieces of evidence that Rockefeller used to convince readers to support his arguments about rebates.
ExtremeBDS [4]

1. Rockefeller envisioned the consolidation of many small oil refineries into one giant company that controlled the production because, when the market for oil grew, the amount of buyers grew more, leading to prices going up and down and many small companies wet into bankruptcy. They created what they called "Our Plan" through Standard Oil to save the industry, by combining the businesses  

2. The three major railroads running through Cleveland and the Oil Regions of Pensylvannia were really costly, but when they were initially setup and the traffic started to grow more and more, the costs decreased, causing very high losses to the them. Since Standard Oil had the market power they were able to get discounts on railway freight rates. If a railroad did not wish to work with the Standard’s demands they would just ship with another railroad, so most of the railroads ended up agreed to work with them to continue with the businesses. Railroads were Erie, New York Central, and Pennsylvania.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are some of President Lincoln’s ideas considered contradictory?
Liula [17]

Answer:

Some of President Lincoln's ideas have been considered contradictory because, during his presidency, he made many decisions that were different from what he had previously expressed on the subject.

Thus, for example, although during his discussions with Senator Douglas, Lincoln defended a gradual limitation to slavery in the country, he flatly refused to be abolitionist; but in 1863, through his Emancipation Proclamation, he abolished slavery in the territory of the United States.

To understand these contradictions, we must take into account the greatness of President Lincoln as president and as a human being. Without a doubt, it was a president who tried to maintain the unity of America as a nation, and made decisions that he did not ideologically share but understood necessary to maintain that union.

8 0
2 years ago
Which two sentences describe the state of Europe after the war?Germany was held responsible for the war and had to pay other cou
Harlamova29_29 [7]
France declared war on Germany immediately after Germany declared war on Russia.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Advanced civilization near the Pacific coast, not far south of the border of Ecuador
    11·2 answers
  • the term ________(1)_________ , which is ________(2)_________, and was renamed after it was purchased by ilford ltd. a. (1) ciba
    10·2 answers
  • Which answer most precisely describes the location of mecca and Medina?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following themes of the modern era sets the era apart from previous time periods?
    13·2 answers
  • How might the overall theme of John Steinbeck's books best be described?
    10·2 answers
  • Read the quotation. “Words . . . may become subject to prohibition when of such a nature and used in such circumstances as to cr
    12·2 answers
  • Why did Southerners argue states' rights were violated by abolition of slavery?
    14·1 answer
  • QUICK PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • When a researcher wishes to know how a set of participants changed over time or across repeated measures of a construct, the met
    11·1 answer
  • Explain the role of European monopoly companies on the development of overseas territories.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!