The correct answer is D) Russia must stop fighting in World War l to end the death and starvation the war has brought.
The other options of the question were A) The czarist system is a Russian tradition that should be reformed but not eliminated. B) Russia should do whatever is necessary to make its government resemble Great Britain's. C) There is never any justification for protesters to use violence to achieve their political aims
A supporter of the Bolsheviks would most likely agree with the following statement: "Russia must stop fighting in World War l to end the death and starvation the war has brought."
In Russia, in the 1920s, the Bolsheviks were the political party that supported the ideas of Karl Marx and were convinced that the proletarian or the people should free themselves from the oppression of the wealthy people. Their political rivals were the Mensheviks. And yes, the Bolsheviks would definitely oppose the participation of Russia in World War 1 for all the damage, pain, and poverty that it caused to Russian people.
The Answer is: When redistricted occurs, political groups try to shape electoral districts so that their parties have an advantage.
Hope it Helps
I've already answered this for you, but I am in the middle of a challenge, so I'll do it again:
Shays' Rebellion was led by Daniel Shay and Job Shattuck to overthrow the government, which was still going along with the Articles of Confederation, it happened a bit later than the date you said though.
The Articles of Confederation gave the states more power over the government, which could be considered both a pro and con, as it made the government weaker. But don't blame them too hard, they had just broke free from King George III for the exact reason of overpowered government, or monarchy.
Under the Articles, Congress had the power to establish laws, declare wars, and had control of the postal service. However, they were unable to enforce laws, also able to make peace, etc.
Both businessmen and farmers alike were upset with the system the new government had, so there's that.
It's probably best that they changed the government's ways to give themselves more power because you can't really trust every state to make the right decision. With a stronger government, there are also stronger laws.
Answer:
blue yodel no.1
Explanation
I think it is the right answer
<span>A tsar was removed from the people and was rarely seen.
The tsar of the early 1900s was an absolute monarch with much control and answered little to the people. Though there were attempts at reform and the creation of a representative body called the Duma, the Tsar, especially Nicholas II, was known to shut it down or event attempted to remove it. Nicholas II would be the last tsar of Russia being forced to abdicate, step down, his throne in 1917. </span>
