The answer is 4 to this question
Answer:
The correct answer is C)
Explanation:
To Alice, the entire trial was a sham. There was a Jury (of which the Lizard was a member) that was incapable of reading. If this was so, how could they evaluate any evidence that spoke to her credit or demerit?
For in the same Chapter 7, a letter or a collection of verses was read which according to the Queen was a piece of evidence against Alice. The Jury, even upon the challenge to do so by Alice, could not interpret the same.
Cheers!
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
Julie’s parents celebrate Halloween, and her friends’ parents do not.
Julie’s parents like tea much more than her friends’ parents do.
Julie’s parents have different jobs than her friends’ parents do.
Julie’s parents prefer books, while her friends’ parents prefer TV.
Answer:
Julie’s parents like tea much more than her friends’ parents do.
Explanation:
This question is about "The Tea Ceremony" where the narrator shows that Julie's friends' parents might even like tea, but it didn't compare to the love Julie's parents had for that drink. Julie's country had a cabinet full of boxes with leaves to make tea and they only drank tea made straight from the leaves, because this, according to them, was the real tea.
Since
there are no choices, a claim must have a complete backup of strong evidences.
It also needs to be logical and free from errors and fallacies. It also depends
on how it is portrayed and conveys with the posture of the person speaking.