Answer:
At the heart of Madison's fears about factions was the unequal distribution of property in society. Ultimately, "the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property," Madison argues (Dawson 1863, p. 58).
In Federalist No. 51, Madison explained how the separation of powers between three branches of the federal government, as well as between state governments and the federal government, established a system of checks and balances that ensured that no one institution would become too powerful.
<h2>Please mark me as brainlyist</h2>
Answer: Broadsides
Don't have too much context on Art Appreciation for me to give you an eloquent explanation on that one. Sorry haha
Las Casas highlighted the atrocities committed by the Spanish against indigenous Native American groups in South America. One of the central claims in Las Casas' <em>Devastation of the Indies</em> focusses on the ways in which Spanish labor system led to the rapid depopulation of native populations,
<em>The correct answer is: 2. </em>Green tea is inelastic in terms of supply.
The elasticity of the supply of a product measures the variation experienced by the quantities of products supplied by the producers before variations in certain factors of production. In our case, the established factor is the market price of the goods to be produced (green tea), and is called the price elasticity of the offer.
The price elasticity of the supply of a product is calculated as the quotient between the differences in the quantity offered to the market by the producers and the differences in the market price of that product.
In this case, the price elasticity of green tea is 67%. The calculation is done as follows:
<em> E (%) = (S2-S1) / (P2-P1) = (5-3) / (7-4) = 2/3 = 67%
</em>
As this value is less than unity, it is said that the green tea is Inelastic in terms of supplies with respect to the market price.
This means that before increases in the price the quantities supplied by the producers increase in a smaller proportion.
<span>Presidents often use executive agreements to sidestep the constitutional "advice and consent" of the senate that is required for formal ratification of treaties. In short, the president can decide what law must be passed without ratifying it by the senate. But this kind of agreements, without the senates's consent is still legally binding so long as the agreement itself is not illegal with regards to the laws of the congress.</span>
