I believe below are the statements:
<span>-The new industrial technologies improved means of transportation.
-The industrial developments caused friction between Europe and North America.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
</span>
The benefits would be trying to get the owners/ managers and higher ups to hear the workers voices and know they aren’t going on strike for no reason they may go on strike for example because they’re not getting paid.
The dangers are that not everyone gets they ways such as the higher ups don’t care if they go on strike.
Hopefully I answered some of it
The rulers of the Soviet Union viewed empire and imperialism in ideological terms as ‘the highest and final stage of capitalism’.1 By this Leninist definition, the Soviet Union did not identify itself as an empire, and instead, its leaders vehemently denounced imperialism that was carried out by its enemies and competitors: the capitalist states. Despite its own anguish over being identified as an empire, the Soviet Union indeed was one. While the meaning of ‘empire’ has shifted over time, for the purposes of this paper the definition of empire is in the sense of a great power, a polity, ruling over vast territories and people, leaving a significant impact on the history of world civilizations.2 As the characteristics of the Soviet Union are examined, support for viewing the USSR as an empire grows.
The Soviet Union emerged after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The Tsarist Russian Empire’s government was overthrown by the local soviets, led by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks attempted to replace the Russian empire with a communist one, in which socialism would make nationalismobsolete and in place there would be a supra-national imperial ideology.3 Still, coming back to the issue of ‘empire’, the Soviet Union clearly maintained a commanding control over multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic societies that surpassed the extent of the preceding Imperial Russia Empire. A question thus arises: was the USSR a Russian empire? The first aspect to consider is if the USSR was a continuation of Russian imperialist power or if an intrinsic distinction can be made between the two. What is notable to address is what is meant by ‘Russian’ identity and nationality, its formation, and reshaping through time. Once this will be accounted for, this paper will move on with an answer to the question: the USSR was indeed an essentially different empire from the one preceding it, and thus, the USSR was not a Russian empire.
Answer:
Olive oil was an all-purpose and essential product in the Roman world from 2nd century BC. Not only were olives and olive oil an important part of the Mediterranean diet and cooking process (and still are, of course) but the oil produced from pressed olives was also used for many other purposes.
Explanation:
Increasing the power and profile of the central government is the exception.
Option: D
Explanation:
Thomas Jefferson for managing the territory of Louisiana followed several ways. He allowed taxation without representation. He has never wanted to give more power to federal or central government. He reduced the power of central government from his level best.
He also reduces the authority of country's arm forces means power of army, navy and defense. He gave emphasis on the growth of agriculture rather than emphasizing on manufacturing or industrial works. He interpreted the construction of constitution as loose.
