<span>Satire is a genre of
literature in which individuals, corporation, government or society are ridiculed
in purpose of constructive social criticism, using wit to draw attention to
both particular and wider issues in society in order to correct or shape
opinions and behavior. But, satire can’t be effective in shaping behavior or
opinions if the audience is always in on the joke and never being targeted. The
effectiveness of satiric work is mirrored in sole comprehension of the targeted
group of individuals that they are wrong, and should correct their opinions and
behavior. Many satiric writers believe that satires should be medicine
disguised as candy, so it would be easier for targeted group to accept it. If
only non-targeted audience comprehend the joke (main idea of satiric work), the
satire would not be effective as they agree with author’s criticism and there
is no need for them to correct their behavior nor their opinions.</span>
Answer:
It was always made from rectangular shapes of various types of material
Explanation:
It was made from rectangular shapes of various types of material such as linen, or silk cloth pinned with fibula at the shoulders and belted or girdle. This was the same for both men and women except that it was worn short for men reaching only up to their knees and was made long for women reaching up to their ankles. The clothing where locally made or home made by the ancient Greeks.
Your answer would be, The primary purpose of " Let Sleeping Dogs Lie"., is to Narrate a personal story that criticizes the draft board.
Hope that helps!!!
This may be too late, I'm sorry!
I read the story but around paragraph 3 at the end, the doctor and julianne were discussing treatments and surgery and I quote.
"Th<span>e oncologist was optimistic that with A combination of surgery to remove the cancerous cells followed by SIX chemotherapy CHEMOTHERAPY TREATMEANTS to ensure that all of the cells were destroyed, Julianne could overcome this cancer and go into remission.</span><span>"
so the answer is (B)
hope I answered the question :D</span>
Answer:
This conclusion lacks to specify the adventures Merri had and the countries in which they were lived.
Explanation:
There is no evidence that Merri really is an adventurer so that the above text is really a conclusion, for this reason it is necessary to add specific experiences about the adventures that Merri lived, thus showing the place where these adventures took place.
In other words, we can say that the conclusion lacks specificity and shows no real adventures so that we can conclude that Merri is really an adventurer.
