i believe steadfast could be one and the other would be fearless.
The correct answer is: Each author uses figurative language.
Indeed, the first author uses figurative language (he took the tortillas out of his poetry) which is followed by a very explicit explanation, that the character in question “took the soul out of his poetry”. This use of figurative language is effective in eliciting an emotional response from the reader by the pathos of the premise, that removing foreign, Mexican Spanish words from the character’s poetry also removes its soul, in other words, its identity.
The second author also uses figurative language and there is a hint of irony in the description that immediately follows the dialogue. The immediate landscape is used to show the “heritage-deprived” person that he actually does have a heritage. In other words, he does not need to be a hyphenated American in order to have a heritage because it is right there “dangling over his head”.
The symbolism of the “tall American tree” is used to show how the speaker of these lines that America has its own heritage, which lies in its history, its melting pot and its territory and he cannot even see it.
Answer:
Through the conversations that Madeline shares with both her father and Emil, a courthouse employee through the foolish acts that Madeline undertakes as she attempts to take a stand.
Explanation:
It is in her discussions with her dad and with Emil that Susan Glaspell best prevails as demonstrating a complexity between a conventional lady who quiets her convictions and her sentiments in a self-destroying way so things may keep on being how they are - so the world that indicates to be about equity and opportunity may keep on quelling the individuals who look for opportunity for their kin, and a lady who makes experiences her feelings without limitations, regardless of what value she may need to pay. Madelin acclaims the sacrificial disposition of her mom when she went to see about the Swedish youngsters with diphteria at the cost of her own life, and of how she doesn't wish to remain at Morton College in the event that she needs to deceive her and her granddad's goals so as to do as such, and in spite of the fact that she can't help contradicting Emil's position.
The sentence that best credits the information from the site is the first example:
Bird expert Lee Sparks describes Harpy Eagles as "oddly attractive, yet insanely dangerous predators."
This is the best way to credit the information, because it gives the reader an idea of who Lee Sparks is, why his opinion is credible, and gives him credit for the words that were used directly from his article.
i think the answer is terror hope this help
please mark brainliest
