Answer:
The longest necklace will obviously have the most amount of beads. Each necklace that is entangled has a different kind of bead and can be traced and differentiated with.
In order to find the necklace with the most beads, what you can do is start tracing the thread and the beads. The thread that goes the longest way and counts the most beads, is the necklace that your'e looking for.
Prepositions show location, direction and time. They are words that are being used to link phrases, nouns and pronouns in a sentence. They are placed before the phrase that is to be linked. Examples are at, to, in, on, from and the like.
Answer
The author was clearly using sarcasm. i know this cause in the question it says only and compares it to a different planet, and we know planets are not a mile close
Explanation:
BAMMMMMMMMMMm
Answer: There is no answer choice
Explanation:
i can't help you brainly it mostly about questions and letter choices
<span>Q1: The ability of an ecosystem to recover from damage.
In the text, it says "the resiliency of the reefs". From this we know that resiliency is a trait that the reefs have. In the next sentence, we see the context clues that define resiliency when it states "reefs bounce back-even flourish." When someone or something bounces back it recovers and returns to it's previous state.
Q2: to inform readers about how the coral reefs are being destroyed AND to convince readers that practices that destroy coral reefs must be stopped.
It is a "Check All That Apply" so more than one answer can be chosen. The passage title is "Save the Coral Reefs" and the selection ends with the sentence "More can be done now to help the coral reefs bounce back". These clues tell the reader that the author's purpose is to save the reefs. In order to do this the author needs to first explain how the reefs are being destroyed. Then convince readers to save the reefs by stopping the practices that destroy them.
Q3: "could help save" and "unsubstantiated risks".
It is important to pay attention to the question here. It is asking for phrases that support safety - not necessarily nutrition. A pixie stick is safe to eat, but not nutritious. The phrase "could help save" supports the idea that it is safe because it is being defined as possibly life and eye-saving. "Unsubstantiated risks" also shows safety because it state that any risks have not been proven and are therefore unfounded. Some of the other phrases such as "more vitamin A" and "more nutritious" support the argument that the food is healthier but are not used to specifically explain how safe it is.</span>