Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Missouri Compromise brought forth by John Holmes makes Missouri a slave trade and Maine as a free state. It also prohibited slavery north of the 36º 30’ parallel.
Thomas Jefferson and his popular republican party were against this compromise for it threatens the balance of free and slave states. Jefferson expressed his disagreement of the Compromise in his letter to John Holmes, referring to the new Congress law as <em>"the knell of the union [...] hushed for the moment. But this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence."</em> And he wholly disagrees with the division of the American union.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is false for Jefferson did not welcome the Compromise but rather felt it further divided the union.
</u>
<u></u>
I’m not sure if this is correct but i think it is c but you might want to keep looking
Political and pragmatic reasons.
I've seen this question before -- I'm guessing you're working with a chapter on European Renaissance and Reformation that featured a secondary source (source B) reference from historian Steve Ozment. In document A, from a letter to the pope sent by Martin Luther, Luther accused the Roman Catholic Church of having become a den of thieves, that the whole hierarchy needed reform. That early letter (from 1520) supports Ozment's claim that Luther's Reformation movement began as a protest against "arbitrary, self-aggrandizing hierarchical authority" in the church.
