Answer:
By 'isness' of humanity's present nature, King meant moral incapibility of humankind to do what is morally obligatory or morally right.
Explanation:
Martin Luther King was bestowed with the Nobel Prize on 11th December, 1964. King was the leader of the Civil Rights Movements, although the movement was sundry to bestow one person the Nobel Prize.
In his speech, he began with reflecting great grief on the loss of lives during this movement. He said
<em>'I refuse to accept the idea that the “</em><em>isness</em><em>” of man's present nature makes him morally incapable of reaching up for the eternal “oughtness” that forever confronts him.'</em>
The term 'isness' refers to the state of being or existence. By 'isness' of humanity's present nature, King meant to say that he refuse to accept that humankind is morally incapable of doing what is morally right or obligatory. The 'existence' of man's present nature of inability to do what is morally right is unacceptable in the eyes of King.
Eramus was one of the earliest reformers and renaissance leaders. Between Luther and the Church of the time, he fallowed middle path and tried to reform the Church within. The three ways that he contrasts the church leaders of his time with the apostles include :
- He was against the corrupt church leaders who used to behave like lords or masters while as apostles were honest, simple and down to earth.
- He rejected the preaching of church leaders that material things leads to salvation while as apostles used to practice and preach that spirituality leads to salvation.
- The Church leaders used to discuss the irrelevant and complicated principles but not practiced even the simple ones while as the apostles preach and practice simple dogmas and doctrine.
I just took the I think it was c
Answer:
In the end the Allies agreed that they would punish Germany and attempt to weaken that nation so much that it wouldn’t pose a future threat. Germany’s representatives had no real choice but to accept the terms.stripped Germany of its colonies in China and Africa, which Qualls explains was a particularly humbling provision. for the Allies for demand that Germany pay reparations
I would say the answer is D., sadly. African Americans did not receive equal pay as whites did.
