Answer:
a. Does Susan’s explanation sound convincing?
No, Susan’s explanation does not sound convincing.
b. Why is Jennifer concerned about Susan looking at the patient’s record?
Jennifer is worried about Susan looking at the patients records, in light of the fact that Susan isn't as it were invavading someone elses privacy, yet additionally wasting time on the PC, when she could be accomplishing something more useful and priductive. As a group we make a solid effort to keep the patients records as private as could be possible.
c. Just because the individual is a patient at the clinic, does that mean any employee has the right to look at the patient’s EHR?
If the employee is not working with the patient then they do not have the right to go into their records. Hence, just because the individual is a patient at the clinic doesn't mean any employee has the right to look at the patient’s EHR.
Thank you :)
Answer:
a
Explanation:
she told him that she would CAREFULLY remove the appenix
C.) Upon returning to the pre-fugue state, an individual will most likely "<span>forget all events or experiences that occurred during the fugue state"
Hope this helps!</span>
First she should put pressure on the wound and tie it up with a gauze before putting hydrogen peroxide on it
He should relax and not rush so his heart rate is not high
