It could be said that this poem is about Native Americans, who are referred to "The Noble Savage" (option1). It portrays the spirit the Natives haunting their graves in the North American wilderness. It might be considered and American example of the Romantic movement.
Here is an example of a eulogy for a dying river:
Let us remember that all things come to an end even the most beautiful and useful of things, like this river. You were once the most beautiful and useful of things to both living and nonliving things. You provided the fish a place to grow and live and the plants the water to survive. You helped form the clouds and cool the forest. But now it's over, you flow no more but our tears do. You may be dying but you will live through the animals and plants you've helped and the rain you've provided.
Answer:
According to the details in the fables, rabbits are clever animals who are good at getting into and out of trouble. They use their intelligence to escape from other animals and defend themselves by living in places like briar patch
Explanation:
Answer: A.) Comparing something that is part of nature to something that is not shows that plastic bags are a problem.
Explanation:
I got it right.
A foil is the near complete opposite of the main character (whichever character they want you to find a foil for).
Rainsford and Whitney were good hunting friends with numerous similar interests. They could not be foils because of how close in similarity they were. Even when they disagreed on how animals felt about being hunted, Whitney seemed open to and intrigued by Rainsford's points and way of thinking.
Ivan is a near irrelevant character, being a mere Cossack who follows whatever General Zaroff says. He is mindless and has almost zero traits to even compare to Rainsford, let alone any traits aside from a mindless follower to begin with.
The answer would be General Zaroff. This is almost like the cliche protagonist vs antagonist foil. Both of them are hunters, but different kinds. Zaroff got bored with animals and wanted to hunt human people instead, whereas Rainsford had enjoyed the thrill of an animal hunt and thinks that the hunting of people is murder. Zaroff is more heartless and cold, a killer, if you will. Rainsford seems to think highly of actual people, and had no interest in playing Zaroff's game.
