<h2><u>
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!</u></h2>
Answer:
See below:
Explanation:
A - Lawrence Kohlberg interviewed a group of young men about moral decision making.
D - Preconventional reasoning is based on following one’s moral principles, but Postconventional reasoning is based on doing what is best for oneself.
D - “Once a person begins to think in a Stage 5 way about what benefits the community as a whole, they will almost never go back to a Stage 2 level of looking out for themselves first.” ( Paragraph 16)
B - Kohlberg could understand how people decided what was the right thing to do.
Write a summary of the article “How do we tell right from wrong?”
--> Sorry friend, you're going to have to write the summary yourself.
I hope this helps! I was not fully sure if the answer was C or D for the third question, but I put D because preconventional reasoning is external (if that makes sense). Have a good night!
- sincerelynini
Yeats states that he was not closely acquainted with the people in the Easter Rising. He acknowledges that he only exchanged pleasantries with them before the uprising. He also indicates that he has personal reasons for disliking one person. So he is writing about the cause for which they stood, which, by inference, is important.
The comparison of the rebels to "stone" suggests that Yeats may have viewed the rebels' attitude as inflexible or not adapted to the changing times. Yeats also acknowledges the possibility that their deaths may have been "needless" because the British might keep their promises.
However, his reference to the "sacrifice" (of all who had supported Irish independence) and the rebels' "excess of love" suggest that he views their cause in a positive light. Moreover, Yeats's repeated description of the kind of change that the uprising has brought about as "a terrible beauty" suggests that his sympathies lie with the rebels.
To summarize, Yeats places a certain distance between the rebels and himself, but he supports the rebels' cause.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Just did the test and got it right also dont let jaspergallegos51 comment on ur questions
Answer:
My name is Anthony Chen, and this is my manifesto as a dining hall prefect.
First of all, I have a three-point agenda to sanitize the dining hall, thus making it more conducive for students. The three points are:
1. Ensuring high quality meals are served in the dining areas
2. Making sure the dining hall is clean at all times. (There will be punishment for defaulters.)
3. Ensuring meals are eaten in peace and love.
It is important that not only healthy foods are served in the dining hall, but also that no essential nutrient is lacking at any given time.
Also equally important is ensuring cleanliness at all times because a dirty place breeds germs faster.
Finally, as the Holy Bible says, "better a meal eaten in love, than a banquet where there is strife". There shall always be peace and love among students.