Even though im not writing the 2 paragraphs let me give you info about one of the cases: <span>Gibbons vs. Ogden: Federally issued permit vs. State (NY) issued permit to navigate waterways around New York. Marshall court re-emphasized Article VI (Supremacy) stating that federal law trumps state and this decision further emphasized the Commerce Clause stating that commerce was not defined solely as the buying and selling of goods, but the transportation thereof as well. Establishing that only the national Congress had the ability to regulate interstate trade, further strengthening the federal government over the states. This case as many affect the nature of federalism regarding its power, rights and roles. </span>
Both accounts mention those who tried to take refuge in the Tower of David, but Fulcher claims all were killed, while al-Athir states they surrendered and were spared. The accounts both claim that all those in the Temple of Solomon were killed, but Fulcher says 10,000 were killed, while al-Athir claims 70,000 died. Fulcher's account is likely more reliable because he was a witness to the event, and his account was written just a few years after it happened, while al-Athir wrote his account more than one hundred years after the event.
A triangular trading system, in which 3 parties are involved.
Two main causes of Arab Israel conflicts in the twentieth century were:
a) the division of <span>Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states.
This general statement is quite known, as all three monotheistic religions claim ownership of the Holy Land.
We can generally say that after the Crusades, Christians remained out of the conflict due to the massive losses they faced when they had tried to invade and conquer it (when Salah Al deen was at power, before the rise of the Ottoman empire).
I am not sure about this one, but I assume the best answer would be D)</span><span>US support for Israels military
</span>
It's a generally known fact that the US is a close ally of Israel, and this is mainly why there are immense issues and conflicts between the two religions whom are living in the same territory/land.
Generally, this topic tends to be those ones that kind of get biased responses (you know, due to people taking sides). I tried making this response as non-biased as possible, filtering it from opinion and such.
Hope this helps. Comment if you need assistance. Glad to assist! :)
Answer:
Jefferson Brings Change!—411 File
American voters wanted a non-Federalist president in the 1800 election, but Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr both won 73 electoral votes, so the House of Representatives took a vote and declared Jefferson the winner.
Explanation:
In "Somebody wanted, but so" sentence constructions, the different actors and their roles are clearly spelt out. The elements are Character, Motivation/Goal, Conflict, and Resolution/Outcome.
The character figure is the subject. "American voters" is the character and the subject of the sentence. Their goal is for "a non-Federalist president in the 1800 election." This is their motivation for voting.
The conflict is followed by the conjunction, "but." In this case, the conflict is that "but Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr both won 73 electoral votes."
Resolution: To resolve the conflict, "the House of Representatives took a vote and declared Jefferson the winner." This is the resolution of the conflict.
The outcome is the declaration of Jefferson as the winner.
Thomas Jefferson was a Federalist president while Aaron Burr was the non-Federalist president that the majority of American voters wanted but could not overwhelmingly vote for, according to the electoral college system. This caused a tie that was decided by the House of Representatives.
