answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
levacccp [35]
2 years ago
10

Harold and Marci decide to burglarize Superior Jewelers. Their friend Carl, an employee at Superior, helps by telling them the l

ocation of the store vault. Marci drives a van to the store and acts as the lookout while Harold goes inside and cracks the safe. After Harold and Marci make their getaway, Harold meets a friend, Shawn, who was not involved in the actual burglary. Harold tells Shawn about the burglary, and Shawn helps Harold get a train out of town. David, a former classmate of Harold and Marci, witnesses the crime but does not tell the police, even though he recognizes both Harold and Marci. How will each person be charged? Explain your answers.
Social Studies
1 answer:
cestrela7 [59]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: This is how each person will be charged:

Principal = Harold

Accomplice=Marci

Accessory before the fact = Carl

Accessory after the fact=Shawn, David

Explanation:

Principal :

Is the person who commit the actual crime , Harold is the one who went inside and cracked the safe hence he is the one who commited the actual crime.

Accomplice:

This is the person who assists someone to commit a crime , Marci drove the van to the place where Harold will commit this crime so she provided him with the transport to go and commit burglary and she is the one who helped Harold get away .

Accessory before the fact:

This is a charge given to someone who encourages ,counsels and aids someone to commit a crime eventhough this person will not be physcally there at the scene. Carl is the one who told them where the vault is located which encouraged them more to commit this crimes because they were equipped with knowledge.

accessory after the fact

This is a charge given to someone who helps a person who has committed a crime eventhough they were also not there at the scene. Shawn is told by Harold that him and merci have commited burglary but he decided to help him get away instead of reporting the crime. David saw the crime being commited but still didn't say a thing to the police.

You might be interested in
Consider the Categorical Imperative that Kant formulates in the reading from his work "Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals"
tester [92]

Answer:

The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator.  Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".

In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.

However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.

3 0
2 years ago
Ajay believes that in the u.s., power is concentrated among a small group of elites who are involved in a constant struggle to k
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
The correct answer is the conflict theory of political and economic systems. 

The conflict theory of political and economic systems is a theory which states that power and wealth lie in the hands of few members of society because there are limited resources available, and thus, constant competition to acquire these resources. Due to this, Ajay (who believes in the conflict theory of political and economic systems) would believe that<span> power is concentrated among a small group of elites who are involved in a constant struggle to keep their power from the non-elites. </span>
3 0
2 years ago
Rita has a credit card that gives a 6% discount on every purchase. The annual percentage rate on the card is 15%. She is purchas
iris [78.8K]

Answer:$204.53

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Miriam is testing a concept that she learned in her child development class. She takes ten pennies to the preschool where she is
beks73 [17]

Answer:

C. Conservation  

 

Explanation:

Conservation is a stage that occurs in the concrete operational stage. In this phenomenon, the conservation is to understand the quantity stay the same even if the appearance has been changed of the objects. If technical we try to understand it is about to understand the redistributing the materials.

The distribution of the object does not affect by the number, mass, and length and its volume. Around seven-year, children understand the conservation of whether the appearance has been changed. Five-year children do not develop conservation so they think there is a difference in the quantity of water if the appearance has been changed.

8 0
2 years ago
The nursing instructor is talking to a class of nursing students about the American's with Disabilities Act, and persons having
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

Answer is

Traumatic brain injury

Autism

Orthopedic impairment

Refer below.

Explanation:

The nursing instructor is talking to a class of nursing students about the American's with Disabilities Act, and persons having various disabilities that have the right to education in the least restrictive environment. The nursing instructor asks the students, "the is the reason for the least restrictive environment are:

Traumatic brain injury

Autism

Orthopedic impairment

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Cowboys borrowed their dress, skill sets, and tools from which of the following cultures?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did farm workers and their families migrate to cities in the 1800s
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a self-serving bias? a. Leonard gets bad grades in sociology and psychology, so he switc
    6·2 answers
  • Carol is standing and talking with colleagues when someone begins talking about a friend who they say is "overweight and lazy."
    7·2 answers
  • Embassies should work as as bridge between two countries to strengthen relationship.justify
    9·1 answer
  • Calvert Island in British Colombia has been found to be a special anthropological location that offers more evidence of early Am
    11·1 answer
  • When she was a child, Amy had a bad experience jumping from a diving board. To this day, she considers herself a weak swimmer. T
    8·1 answer
  • Jillian is a 69-year-old woman. Lately, she has been having difficulty remembering things, and she is also getting into meaningl
    15·1 answer
  • What role does a school play to stop the inyellectual migration​
    7·1 answer
  • Martha, as a home-service medical care volunteer, has cared for George through the final weeks of his fatal illness. Just before
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!