Answer:
The answer to the question: What is the author´s purpose for including this statement, would be: To show the greatness, and yet the simplicity, of the innovations and discoveries that this researcher, Terry Sejnowski accomplished, regarding learning, on many fields, including language mastering. This neuroscientist, better known as Terrence Joseph Sejnowki, has been known around the world for his work on neural circuits, and other things regarding how the brain works, especially when it comes to learning, and mastering different fields of knowledge. What he showed through his multiple research is that learning is much simpler than it was used to believe, and it required the correct work of a neural circuit. He found that this neural circuit was the only thing necessary to ensure proper learning, and that is what the author in "Talking Robots" wanted to express through this excerpt.
1. Appropriate 2. Inappropriate, seek help immediately 3. Inappropriate, seek help immediately 4. Appropriate
Answer:
There are two sections of the story that lend credence to the fact that Nous firebrand was the last one to be thrown during the Chief's visit.
- The third sentence in the third paragraph indicates that they took turns and that Nous turn came last because, after Nous turn, there was no other mention of any other throw. This means that all the other older warriors that thrown their flames before Nou.
- The third and fourth sentences in paragraph 4 state that everyone was happy except the older fire throwers because Nou had made them look weak and foolish.
This corroborates the evidence from the third paragraph that they had thrown their fires first and Nous fire went last.
Cheers!
ANSWER: <span>B) This latest attack is yet another in a long line of lies from the lunatics in the opposing party.
EXPLANATION:
-Inflammatory Language contains statements which cause anger, excitement, or unnecessary wording that might trigger a person or certain group of people.
-All the other choices keep their statements ranging from neutral to somewhat irritating, but Answer B) is savage (calling the opposing party lunatics, dang...)
Hope this Helps!</span>