What does the writer imply in this line from the excerpt?

English

1 answer:

I am Lyosha [343]1 year ago

3 0

Answer:

The writer is implying that politicians are shameless people who would do anything for their own gain.

Explanation:

Charles Farrar Browne was an American humorist writer and a comedian who is more better known by his pen name Artemus Ward. His book "Interview With Lincoln" is a satirical or humorous representation of the real world as he sees it.

The passage from the question is from the text where he seems to suggest that the "owner" of the place was a generous place. But with politicians, there can be no honor or full trust. The use of the word "hog-pen" suggests that he is ready to accommodate anyone who's willing to be on his side. After his whole place had been filled, he still wants people to be with him even though there seems to be no space left. Thus, these lines seems to imply that the politicians will do anything if it's going to give them some profit out of the situation. It shows their shamelessness.

You might be interested in

Allen presents a counterargument involving respect for the flag at the beginning of the editorial. How does this contribute to t

viva [34]

This question is about the article "American flag stands for tolerance"

Answer and Explanation:

Allen shows that he believes that an individual can present better ways to show his discontent with the government instead of disrespecting the national flag by burning it, with that, we can see that he does not agree with the Supreme Court's decision to allow the burning of flags is a fair protest against the government, but quickly Allen claims that the Supreme Court is correct in allowing this, since even presenting a form of disrespect, the burning of flags is part of a peaceful protest, in addition to allowing freedom of expression in the country.

This shows that Allen's arguments are based on the country's ethical and legal standards and not on his own opinions, or on the sentimetalism he may feel for national symbols. He addresses the counterargument as a justification as to why he should not evaluate the Supreme Court's permission, but rather support it. This can be seen through the paragraph:

<em>"The American flag is a cherished symbol of our national aspirations [...] iven the widespread and deeply felt reverence for this symbol of what we perceive to be the best of our civilization, what is the harm in insisting upon a modicum of respect for it? [...] Any messages that burning the flag might convey easily can be communicated in other ways. </em>

<em>The Supreme Court was not wrong. Indeed, a decision contrary to the one reached would have been a definitive step away from our national aspirations. A commitment to the intertwined freedoms of conscience and expression is at the core of those aspirations. What most distinguishes our civilization from both its predecessors and its contemporary competitors is a belief in the sanctity of the human conscience. Each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom. That requires not just the right to be let alone, but also the right to communicate with, to learn from and test views in conversations."</em>

4 0

2 years ago

Use the drop-down menus to select the word or phrase that completes each sentence.

Lilit [14]

Answer:

problem

question with solution found in text

solution

question without a clear solution

Explanation:

i got it right.

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Hiroshi is planning to write an essay comparing news reports and editorials. Which ideas should he brainstorm about in order to

Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

The characteristics of editorials
The characteristics of news reports
How news reports and editorials are similar
How news reports and editorials are different

Explanation:

Since his essay is about comparing news reports and editorials, these are the four things he should focus on. It does not matter what genres are similar to news reports and editorials, since his essay is just about the two things.

4 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

The court was very cool and a little damp, and full of premature twilight, although the sky, high up overhead, was still bright

Lera25 [3.4K]

B. YOU DID ME DIRTY :(

5 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Cam someone help me with my question for my assignment by posted these question on there question please will be helpful i ask t

const2013 [10]

Answer: