answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
torisob [31]
2 years ago
5

in the unit review you wrote a statement in which you explain whether you considered government under the Roman republic or gove

rnment under the Roman empire to be more successful NY elaborate on that statement by writing an essay in which you evaluate the success of the Roman republic and Roman empire provide at least two ways in which you consider each type of government to have been successful in two ways in which you can search to have been unsuccessful in your conclusion propose one change for both the republic and empire which would have fix the problems of Roman society teacher to explain your reasoning with evidence from the unit from world history
History
1 answer:
MrMuchimi2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Roman Empire and the Roman republic had each moments of political instability.

success of the Roman Empire

-The success of the Roman Empire has to do with the extent of their domain. They had lots of cities under their control and it was a large empire. Unlike the Roman Republic which spread was towards the italian peninsula, the Roman Empire had a large spread from the byzantine .

They are stable political structure , they were organised in terms of leadership

-Success of the Roman Republic

-They were able to manage internal political struggle e.g the struggle of orders

-The Republic lasted for centuries

Failure of the Roman Republic

Internal crisis which later led to the demise of the republic

-social unrest

-fiancial crisis to keep up with the expenses of the state

Failure of the Roman Empire

-The empire fell because the leaders failed in enforcement of certain riles which created room for instability

-The Empire could not manage its expansion and had to spend a lot on military prowess and machinery to establish its rule where ever they went. This later led to its fall.

Conclusion

-The roman Empire and Republic would have managed her leadership well in terms of Government spending

-They out to enforce the will of the state and bring every offenders to book

-They would have strengthened their military might internally and externally which will not have led to the attacks by the Barbarians.

-

Explanation:

The Roman Empire and the Roman republic had each moments of political instability.

success of the Roman Empire

-The success of the Roman Empire has to do with the extent of their domain. They had lots of cities under their control and it was a large empire. Unlike the Roman Republic which spread was towards the italian peninsula, the Roman Empire had a large spread from the byzantine .

They are stable political structure , they were organised in terms of leadership

-Success of the Roman Republic

-They were able to manage internal political struggle e.g the struggle of orders

-The Republic lasted for centuries

Failure of the Roman Republic

Internal crisis which later led to the demise of the republic

-social unrest

-fiancial crisis to keep up with the expenses of the state

Failure of the Roman Empire

-The empire fell because the leaders failed in enforcement of certain riles which created room for instability

-The Empire could not manage its expansion and had to spend a lot on military prowess and machinery to establish its rule where ever they went. This later led to its fall.

Conclusion

-The roman Empire and Republic would have managed her leadership well in terms of Government spending

-They out to enforce the will of the state and bring every offenders to book

-They would have strengthened their military might internally and externally which will not have led to the attacks by the Barbarians.

-

You might be interested in
5. Sino ang nagsilbing kalihim ng Kagawaran ng Katarungan nang dumating ang mga Hapon?
ziro4ka [17]

Answer:

A:Jose Manalo

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps

7 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast the author’s depictions of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin. What do these depictions reveal about these hist
Vinvika [58]

Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin

Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.

  • Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
  • Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
  • Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
  • Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant  torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
  • The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.

Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.                  

4 0
2 years ago
What is folsom’s main defense of Rockefeller’s tactics
arlik [135]
There main defense was Rockefeller's size allowed him to cut costs.

I hope this helped! :)
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The first dinosaur fossil and the fossil found on the vega island in 1986 were representative of what geological time period?
Korolek [52]
The correct answer is <span>the late Cretaceous period. There were many fossils found in the area, not just on Vega island, but they were connected to the cretaceous period and were mostly fossils of </span><span>hadrosaurs, plesiosaurs, and <span>mosasaurs. The first one was found a couple years earlier.</span></span>
6 0
2 years ago
What best describes the principle of informed consent as described in the belmont report?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

D. Information, comprehension, voluntariness.

Explanation:

The Belmont report was created issued on 30 September 1978. It was published in the federal register 18th April 1979 by  National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research.

It talks about various guidelines and principles for research that involves human  subjects. The core principles identified in the report are Justice, beneficence and respect for persons, and the three areas of application are selection of risks and benefit, informed consent and selection of subjects.

<em> It explained the informed consent as an important part of respect for all persons, informed consent means that all the subjects should be given opportunity to decide what shall and shall not happen to them,</em>

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the differences between the Enlightenment philosophies and the philosophy of Sir Robert Filmer.
    10·2 answers
  • How is the right-hand side of the woodcut different from the left-hand side? What is the effect of this difference?
    8·2 answers
  • Which type of communication is usually handwritten?
    7·2 answers
  • Which characteristics shaped society and culture in the Maurya empire under Asoka’s rule?
    6·2 answers
  • Positives and negatives of originalism
    8·2 answers
  • "a great democracy has got to be progressive or it will soon cease to be great or a democracy." Can u explain the meaning of thi
    8·1 answer
  • Age of Encounter: Comparing Journeys
    8·1 answer
  • In the video, a soldier makes an unusual request. What does he want to hear Lana Turner say?
    9·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST AVAILABLE! Which statement describes an example of how climate affects the economy of countries in North America? Cou
    10·2 answers
  • How did Pope Urban unite his forces so they would be willing to go to war despite a lack of biblical justification for doing so?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!