The client suffered an unwarranted police invasion and this is outrageous because it disobeys the Fourth Constitutional Amendment.
We can reach this conclusion because:
- The defense attorney could claim that the home invasion without filing a search warrant violates the Fourth Constitutional Amendment.
- This amendment states that no search or seizure of evidence of a crime can be carried out in the suspects' homes, without a search and seizure warrant being presented.
- In this case, the lawyer could claim that the police violated a client's citizen's right by breaking into and searching the house for drugs.
While this is true, there are some cases where the Fourth Amendment can be ignored and law enforcement officers can break into homes looking for evidence of serious crimes, such as drug trafficking, for example.
Therefore, even using this fourth amendment to defend the client, he could not claim that the police acted incorrectly.
More information:
brainly.com/question/15026474?referrer=searchResults
Vegatation in North dakota would be best described as a grassland
Both accounts mention those who tried to take refuge in the Tower of David, but Fulcher claims all were killed, while al-Athir states they surrendered and were spared. The accounts both claim that all those in the Temple of Solomon were killed, but Fulcher says 10,000 were killed, while al-Athir claims 70,000 died. Fulcher's account is likely more reliable because he was a witness to the event, and his account was written just a few years after it happened, while al-Athir wrote his account more than one hundred years after the event.
