The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Mass media and communications technology can be used to preserve indigenous languages in the Americas in different ways.
According to the<em> graphics</em> attached, we can see that in the Americas, 17% of the languages are lost and 16% are endangered.
This data is critical and concerns not only scholars or historians, but it has to worry all the citizens because part of our history can be erased if indigenous languages disappear.
Mass media can be used to help solve this issue because modern technology has no frontiers. If governments invest in proper technological infrastructure to take modern communications systems to the tribes or far away places where many tribes inhabit, this could be a direct way to rescue those endangered languages. This possibility shows that there are options available. The use of the internet is a great resource, proving that no matter the distance, every member of a society or indigenous tribe can be connected and could take classes on the internet, or listening to news broadcasting systems in their former language, as well as reading publications in their languages.
Answer:
<u>The proportion of women who ran the marathon and had a finishing time less than Kathy's is 66% (rounding to the next whole)</u>
Explanation:
1. Let's review the information given to us to answer the question properly:
μ of finishing time for women = 259 minutes
σ of finishing time for women = 32 minutes
Finishing time for Kathy = 272 minutes
2. What proportion of women who ran the marathon had a finishing time less than Kathy's? Show your work.
Let's calculate the z-score for the finishing time for Kathy, as follows:
z-score = (272 - 259)/32
z-score = 13/32 = 0.41 (rounding to the next hundredth)
Using the z-table, now we can calculate the proportion of women who ran the marathon had a finishing time less than Kathy's:
p (z=0.41) = 0.6591
<u>The proportion of women who ran the marathon and had a finishing time less than Kathy's is 66% (rounding to the next whole)</u>
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Answer A and D talked about the size of the cities and according to the passage, it didn't mention about the size comparison between the Aztec cities and European cities. Answer B is not correct because it didn't mention about the people having diseases nor it didn't describe the cities as being dirty. Here's a clue to the question. "They then gave such an account of the magnificence and splendour of his court", "great strength of his metropolis", "several causeways, they added, led to this city, which were intersected in various places, over which wooden bridges were built, under which canoes could pass; but, if they were removed, the space between every two sections became an island, and all entrance to the town was completely cut off", "balconies were attached to each house, which were provided with a kind of breastwork, so that the inhabitants were able to defend themselves from the tops of the houses. Yet the whole town was well supplied with sweet water from the spring of Chapultepec, which lay about two miles from the town, whence the water was partly conveyed to the houses by means of pipes, partly in boats through the canals, and then retailed to the inhabitants.” Based on the quotations, you can see that it said about how organized the Aztecs were in terms of civil infrastructure making C the correct answer. Remember the infrastructure involves design, analysis, and management of infrastructure supporting human activities, including, for example, electric power, oil and gas, water and wastewater, communications, transportation, and the collections of buildings that make up urban and rural communities.
