Answer:
The second one.
Explanation:
The legislatures made laws, and his refusal to consent to them showed his lack of support.
Answer:
Topic: The Founding Fathers rebelling against the British government and declaring independence
My Viewpoint: They were Justified
Explanation:
The first question to ask is this:
By what philosophy, moral justification, logical necessity and or natural law did the Britons see fit to colonise the Founding Fathers?
Colonisation was not exactly a British idea for they had also been colonised by France. History shows that the relationship Between Britain and France was severed on the alter fueled by gallons of blood from various wars between both countries. If Britain saw it fit to exercise self-determination, then there is no reason the founding Fathers should be held liable to a wrong for doing the same.
Cheers
Because of its lack of enforcement powers, most civil rights groups viewed the Commission as a "toothless tiger." EEOC made significant contributions to equal employment opportunity between 1965 and 1971 by using the powers it had to help define discrimination in the workplace
Answer:
It is illegal to lie in a US court of law.
Explanation:
The House of Wisdom (Arabic: بيت الحكمة, romanized: Bayt al-Ḥikmah), also known as the Grand Library of Baghdad, refers to either a major Abbasid public academy and intellectual center in Baghdad or to a large private library belonging to the Abbasid Caliphs during the Islamic Golden Age.[1][2] The House of Wisdom is the subject of an active dispute over its functions and existence as a formal academy, an issue complicated by a lack of physical evidence following the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate and a reliance on corroboration of literary sources to construct a narrative. The House of Wisdom was founded either as a library for the collections of the Caliph Harun al-Rashid in the late 8th century (then later turn
